Cited by 522Plant biochemistry and biosynthesisInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlForest Insect Ecology and Management

Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants

Gershenzon, Jonathan·1994·Journal of Chemical Ecology

Abstract

The net value of any plant trait can be assessed by measuring the costs and benefits associated with that trait. While the other contributors to this issue examine the possible benefits of terpenoids to plants, this article explores the metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in plants in the light of recent advances in terpenoid biochemistry. Terpenoids are more expensive to manufacture per gram than most other primary and secondary metabolites due to their extensive chemical reduction. The enzyme costs of making terpenoids are also high since terpenoid biosynthetic enzymes are apparently not shared with other metabolic pathways. In fact, plant cells may even possess more than one set of enzymes for catalyzing the basic steps of terpenoid formation. Terpenoids are usually sequestered in complex, multicellular secretory structures, and so storage costs for these substances are also likely to be substantial. However, not all of the processes involved in terpenoid accumulation require large investments of resources. For instance, the maintenance of terpenoid pools is probably inexpensive because there is no evidence that substantial quantities of terpenes are lost as a result of metabolic turnover, volatilization, or leaching. Moreover, plants may reduce their net terpenoid costs by employing individual compounds in more than one role or by catabolizing substances that are no longer needed, although it is still unclear if such practices are widespread. These findings (and oth…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02059810

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Gershenzon, J.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gershenzon, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of Chemical Ecology
Published
1994-06
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
1281-1328
ISSN
  • 0098-0331 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1561
OpenAlex
W2062138213
Cited by
522
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Keywords
terpenoids, terpenoid biosynthesis, metabolic cost, secondary metabolites, plant defense, carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis, resource availability hypothesis, catabolism, volatilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review