A scale for measuring propensity for abusiveness
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four studies that compared clinical groups of IPV perpetrators with control groups of non-perpetrators showed that attachment anxiety or fearful attachment make the difference between the two groups, and that IPV has a negative correlation (r = −0.30) with the attachment dimension of closeness.
“Four studies that confronted clinical groups of IPV perpetrators with control groups of non-perpetrators showed that attachment anxiety or fearful attachment make the difference between the two groups (Dutton et al., 1994, 1996; Dutton, 1995) and that IPV has a negative correlation (r = −0.30) with the attachment dimension of closeness (Lawson, 2008).”
From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Dutton, 1995
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- Dutton, D. G.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Dutton, Donald G.
- Venue
- Journal of Family Violence
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-221
- ISSN
- 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2851
- OpenAlex
- W1970848231
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of British Columbia
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, female partners, self-report scale, emotional abuse, physical abuse, scale validation, cross-validation, social desirability
- MeSH terms
- Americas, Behavior, Canada, Crime, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Family Characteristics, Family Relations, North America, Personality, Psychology, Social Behavior, Social Problems, Women, Domestic Violence, Developed Countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
