The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical exponents, hyperscaling, and universal amplitude ratios for two- and three-dimensional self-avoiding walks
Open accessAbstract
We make a high-precision Monte Carlo study of two- and three-dimensional self-avoiding walks (SAWs) of length up to 80,000 steps, using the pivot algorithm and the Karp-Luby algorithm. We study the critical exponentsv and 2Δ4 −γ as well as several universal amplitude ratios; in particular, we make an extremely sensitive test of the hyperscaling relationdv = 2Δ4 −γ. In two dimensions, we confirm the predicted exponentv=3/4 and the hyperscaling relation; we estimate the universal ratios /=0.14026±0.00007, /=0.43961±0.00034, and Ψ*=0.66296±0.00043 (68% confidence limits). In three dimensions, we estimatev=0.5877±0.0006 with a correctionto-scaling exponentΔ1=0.56±0.03 (subjective 68% confidence limits). This value forv agrees excellently with the field-theoretic renormalization-group prediction, but there is some discrepancy forΔ1. Earlier Monte Carlo estimates ofv, which were ≈0.592, are now seen to be biased by corrections to scaling. We estimate the universal ratios /=0.1599±0.0002 and Ψ*=0.2471±0.0003; since Ψ*>0, hyperscaling holds. The approach to Ψ* is from above, contrary to the prediction of the two-parameter renormalization-group theory. We critically reexamine this theory, and explain where the error lies. In an appendix, we prove rigorously (modulo some standard scaling assumptions) the hyperscaling relationdv = 2Δ4 −γ for two-dimensional SAWs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalization Group
Binney, J. J., Dowrick, N. J., Fisher, A. J., & Newman, M. E. J. (1992) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198513940.001.0001 · Cited by 1,243
Cited by
Non-perturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics
Berges, J., Tetradis, N., & Wetterich, C. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00098-9 · Cited by 1,548
Biological and synthetic membranes: What can be learned from a coarse-grained description?
MULLER, M., KATSOV, K., & SCHICK, M. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.003 · Cited by 320
Local topology and perestroikas in protein structure and folding dynamics
Begun, A., Chernodub, M. N., Molochkov, A., & Niemi, A. J. (2025) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.111.024406 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, B., Madras, N., & Sokal, A. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Statistical Physics
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 661-754
- ISSN
- 0022-4715 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9613
- OpenAlex
- W1982610162
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical exponents, hyperscaling, and universal amplitude ratios for two- and three-dimensional self-avoiding walks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02178552
- The paper
- Li, B., Madras, N., & Sokal, A. D. (1995). Critical exponents, hyperscaling, and universal amplitude ratios for two- and three-dimensional self-avoiding walks. Journal of Statistical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02178552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.