Affective modulation of the startle reflex in schizophrenic patients
Abstract
Startle-elicited blinks were measured during the presentation of affective slides in order to investigate emotional responsiveness in 24 male healthy subjects and 34 male schizophrenic patients. Although the two groups did not differ with regard to their subjective and autonomic responses to the slide stimuli, there was a significant difference between the groups in their responses to the startle probes. Patients rated low in affective expression showed a linear response pattern comparable to that of normal controls with largest amplitudes during unpleasant slides and smallest during pleasant slides. Patients without apparent deficit in affective expression showed a quadratic relationship with smaller blink amplitudes during both pleasant and unpleasant slides. Diminished affective expression rated on the basis of a clinical interview is not associated with a general attenuation of the blink reflex or of its modulation by exposure to emotional slides. Thus, we found no indication of an impairment in the perception of affective stimuli nor of reduced appreciation of pleasant stimuli (anhedonia) in these patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychophysiological studies of patients with schizophrenia indicate comparable or more exaggerated facial responsivity to positive and negative stimuli, assessed via facial electromyography, skin conductance, and affective modulation of the startle eyeblink response.
“psychophysiological studies of patients with schizophrenia indicate comparable or more exaggerated facial responsivity to positive and negative stimuli, assessed via facial electromyography [397,398], skin conductance [399,400], and affective modulation of the startle eyeblink response [401,402].”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [402]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Schlenker, R., Cohen, R., & Hopmann, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- Venue
- European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 245
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 309-318
- ISSN
- 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
- 0940-1334
- 1433-8491
- OpenAlex
- W1985728966
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- startle response, blink reflex, schizophrenia, emotional expression, emotional responsiveness, anhedonia, unpleasant stimuli, autonomic responses, emotional modulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Arousal, Electromyography, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Reflex, Startle, Videotape Recording
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review