Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Doing government to the people

Abernethy, Virginia·1997·Population and Environment

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02208421

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Ahlburg, Dennis A. & Vaupel, James W. (1990). 500 million Americans by 2050?Demography 27 (4), 639–647. · DOI
  2. Barnett, Don (Feb. 26, 1996). A refuge of lies.National Review, p. 46.
  3. Bordering on Disaster (May 20, 1996). National Review, pp. 16, 18.
  4. Carrying Capacity Network (1995). Polls show most Americans want immigration levels reduced. Washington, D.C: Author.
  5. Heim, Mary & Austin, Nancy (1996). Fertility of immigrant women in California.Population and Environment 17 (5), 391–408. · DOI
  6. Huddle, Donald (1995).The net national costs of immigration. Washington, D.C: Carrying Capacity Network.
  7. Keyfitz, Nathan (1993). Thirty years of demography.Demography 30, 533–549. · DOI
  8. Kinsley, Michael J. & Lovins, L. Hunter (1995). Paying for growth, prospering from development. Snowmass, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute.
  9. Rough Road Ahead (Spring 1996).Immigration Review 25, 3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Abernethy, V.
Venue
Population and Environment
Published
1997-01
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
227-231
ISSN
  • 0199-0039
  • 1573-7810
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review