Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures

Schlegel, Rodolfo D., Dehni, Nidal, Parc, Rolland, Caplin, Scott, Tiret, Emmanuel·2001·Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The incidence of colorectal anastomotic strictures varies from 3 to 30 percent. Most of these anastomotic strictures are simple narrowings shorter than 1 cm that can be successfully treated by dilation or endoscopic alternatives. However, up to 28 percent of patients will require surgical correction. This can be technically difficult, with the possibility of a permanent colostomy. This study reports the outcomes after operative treatment of severe strictures of colorectal anastomoses. METHODS: From August 1992 to October 1996, 27 patients were referred for surgical treatment of severe rectal anastomotic strictures. The reasons for the initial surgery were as follows: rectal cancer (13), diverticular disease (7), Hirschsprung's disease (2), rectal endometriosis (2), uterine carcinoma with rectal invasion (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with rectosigmoid necrosis (1), and rectovaginal fistula (1). There were 15 (56 percent) stapled anastomoses, and 21 (78 percent) patients had developed a postoperative leak. RESULTS: The median time between initial surgery and diagnosis of the stenosis was 7.2 (range, 1-24) months and between the last operation and referral was 15.1 (range, 1-44) months. Stenosis was located at a mean distance of 9.5 (range, 4-15) cm from the anal verge. Eleven patients (41 percent) had been unsuccessfully dilated before referral. Surgical correction of the stenosis required 7 colorectal anastomoses for upper rectal anastomotic strictures and 20 coloanal anastomoses for middle and lower rectal strictures (19 Soave's procedures and 1 colon J-pouch-anal anastomosis). Intestinal continuity was restored in all cases. After a mean follow-up of 28.7 +/- 14 months, no recurrences were detected and functional results were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the stenosis and construction of a new colorectal anastomosis can be performed successfully for upper rectal anastomotic stricture. For a stenosis located in the middle and lower rectum, Soave's procedure offers a good alternative, with satisfactory long-term functional results. Whichever technique is used, a permanent colostomy should rarely be required.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02234598

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Schlegel, R. D., Dehni, N., Parc, R., Caplin, S., & Tiret, E.
Venue
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Published
2001-10
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
1464-1468
ISSN
0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058714417
Cited by
181
References
0
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02234598
The paper
Schlegel, R. D., Dehni, N., Parc, R., Caplin, S., & Tiret, E. (2001). Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02234598

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.