The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures
Abstract
PURPOSE: The incidence of colorectal anastomotic strictures varies from 3 to 30 percent. Most of these anastomotic strictures are simple narrowings shorter than 1 cm that can be successfully treated by dilation or endoscopic alternatives. However, up to 28 percent of patients will require surgical correction. This can be technically difficult, with the possibility of a permanent colostomy. This study reports the outcomes after operative treatment of severe strictures of colorectal anastomoses. METHODS: From August 1992 to October 1996, 27 patients were referred for surgical treatment of severe rectal anastomotic strictures. The reasons for the initial surgery were as follows: rectal cancer (13), diverticular disease (7), Hirschsprung's disease (2), rectal endometriosis (2), uterine carcinoma with rectal invasion (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with rectosigmoid necrosis (1), and rectovaginal fistula (1). There were 15 (56 percent) stapled anastomoses, and 21 (78 percent) patients had developed a postoperative leak. RESULTS: The median time between initial surgery and diagnosis of the stenosis was 7.2 (range, 1-24) months and between the last operation and referral was 15.1 (range, 1-44) months. Stenosis was located at a mean distance of 9.5 (range, 4-15) cm from the anal verge. Eleven patients (41 percent) had been unsuccessfully dilated before referral. Surgical correction of the stenosis required 7 colorectal anastomoses for upper rectal anastomotic strictures and 20 coloanal anastomoses for middle and lower rectal strictures (19 Soave's procedures and 1 colon J-pouch-anal anastomosis). Intestinal continuity was restored in all cases. After a mean follow-up of 28.7 +/- 14 months, no recurrences were detected and functional results were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the stenosis and construction of a new colorectal anastomosis can be performed successfully for upper rectal anastomotic stricture. For a stenosis located in the middle and lower rectum, Soave's procedure offers a good alternative, with satisfactory long-term functional results. Whichever technique is used, a permanent colostomy should rarely be required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhang, H., Li, S., Jin, X., Wu, X., Zhang, Z., Shen, L., Wan, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, W., et al. (2022) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-022-02031-4 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlegel, R. D., Dehni, N., Parc, R., Caplin, S., & Tiret, E.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1464-1468
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058714417
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02234598
- The paper
- Schlegel, R. D., Dehni, N., Parc, R., Caplin, S., & Tiret, E. (2001). Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02234598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.