Threatened biotas: "Hot spots" in tropical forests
Abstract
The mass-extinction episode underway is largely centered on tropical forests, insofar as they contain at least half of all Earth's species and they are being depleted faster than any other biome. But species distributions and depletion patterns are anything but uniform throughout the biome. This paper identifies 10 areas that a) are characterized by exceptional concentrations of species with high levels of endemism and b) are experiencing unusually rapid rates of depletion. While these "hotspot" areas comprise less than 3.5% of remaining primary forests, they harbor over 34,000 endemic plant species (27% of all plant species in tropical forests and 13% of all plant species worldwide). They also feature 700,000 endemic animal species and possibly several times more. Unfortunately, they appear likely to lose 90% of their forest cover as soon as the end of the century or shortly thereafter, causing the extinction of almost 7% of Earth's plant species and at least a similar proportion of animal species, this occurring in only 0.2% of Earth's land surface. By concentrating on such areas where needs are greatest and where the pay-off from safeguard measures would also be greatest, conservationists can engage in a more systematized response to the challenge of large-scale extinctions impending in tropical forests.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Upper Guinea Forest is considered a biodiversity hotspot.
“Owing to high species endemism and rapid forest loss, the UGF is considered a biodiversity hotspot, but forest loss and degradation have continued (Myers 1988, Mittermeier et al. 2004, Curtis et al. 2018).”
From Forest loss during 2000–2019 in pygmy hippopotamus (<i>Choeropsis liberiensis</i>) habitats was driven by shifting agriculture (2024) · cites this paper as Myers 1988
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 91 · Cited by 1,558
- Authors
- Myers, N.
- Corresponding author
- Myers, Norman
- Venue
- The Environmentalist
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 187-208
- ISSN
- 0251-1088 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2991
- OpenAlex
- W1980691613
- Cited by
- 1,558
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environment Systems & Decisions (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Queensland Government
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- biodiversity hotspots, tropical forests, endemism, mass extinction, forest cover loss, plant extinction, animal extinction, conservation prioritization, primary forest
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Environment, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Trees, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review