Cited by 4

Nicotine polacrilex dose effects: serum nicotine levels and sensory characteristics

Leischow, S. J., Sachs, D. P. L., Hansen, M. D., Bostrom, A. G.·1995·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

This study evaluated serum nicotine and sensory differences of five different doses of nicotine polacrilex (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg nicotine), three of which have been used as placebo doses in clinical trials (0.0, 0.5, and 1.0 mg) and two of which are currently available as pharmacologic treatments for smoking cessation (2.0 or 4.0 mg nicotine). Twenty-one smokers received, on different days and in random order, five pieces of each of the five doses of polacrilex. The objective of the study was to evaluate whether consistent serum nicotine and sensory differences would be observed between the doses. After 5 h use, the 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg doses produced the following results: (1) there was a linear trend across the placebo doses of nicotine polacrilex in serum nicotine and nicotine flavor, although pairwise dose comparisons were not significant, (2) the 0.0 and 0.5 mg placebo doses resulted in serum nicotine and sensory ratings that were significantly different from the 2.0 mg dose, and even more so from the 4.0 mg dose, (3) the 1.0 mg dose was not different from the 2.0 mg dose on serum nicotine level and several sensory characteristics, though it was different from the 4.0 mg dose on both, and (4) the 4.0 mg dose resulted in significantly higher serum nicotine and usually higher sensory ratings than the 2.0 mg dose. Since the 0.0 mg placebo achieves sensory effects that are comparable to the nicotine-containing placebo doses, it is recommended over the 0.5…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02245177

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leischow, S. J., Sachs, D. P. L., Hansen, M. D., & Bostrom, A. G.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1995-01
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
125-129
ISSN
  • 0033-3158
  • 1432-2072
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review