Cited by 9Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A double-blind comparison of moclobemide and toloxatone in out-patients presenting a major depressive disorder

Lemoine, P., Mirabaud, C.·1992·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

A double-blind comparison of moclobemide and toloxatone was performed in adult out-patients diagnosed as suffering from a major depressive disorder. Parallel groups of patients received moclobemide, 450 mg/day (n = 135) or toloxatone, 1000 mg/day (n = 133) for 28 days. Both groups showed a significant clinical improvement while on therapy; the response was most marked and rapid in those receiving moclobemide treatment. Improvement was greatest in those patients with the most severe depression at the time of trial onset. A significantly higher number of patients returned to normal sleep patterns following moclobemide treatment than following toloxatone. Overall, tolerance was rated as good or very good in more than 80% of patients. The most frequent complaints in the moclobemide-treated group were hot flushes, dry mouth, constipation and headache, while an increase in anxiety was associated with toloxatone usage. Moclobemide was found to be as effective as toloxatone in the treatment of major depressive episodes, but with the advantages of improved sleep patterns and reduced anxiety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02246253

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep was observed to be better with moclobemide (450mg) than with toloxatone (100mg).

    “(Sogaard et al., 1999) found that moclobemide (300-450mg) was associated with poorer BFW scores on LSEQ than sertraline, while sleep was observed to better with moclobemide (450mg) than with toloxatone (100mg; (Lemoine and Mirabaud, 1992)).”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Lemoine and Mirabaud, 1992

  • In depressed patients, significantly more of the moclobemide group showed improved sleep patterns than the toloxatone group.

    “Sig more MOC group showed improved sleep patterns than TOL”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Lemoine, 1992

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lemoine, P., & Mirabaud, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (FR)
  • Roche (France) (FR)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1992-02
Volume
106
Issue
S1
Pages
S118-S119
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2030991730
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
moclobemide, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, sleep disorders, anxiety, adverse drug reactions, outpatients, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase B inhibitors
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Benzamides, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Outpatients, Oxazoles, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Moclobemide, Oxazolidinones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review