The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A double-blind comparison of moclobemide and toloxatone in out-patients presenting a major depressive disorder
Abstract
A double-blind comparison of moclobemide and toloxatone was performed in adult out-patients diagnosed as suffering from a major depressive disorder. Parallel groups of patients received moclobemide, 450 mg/day (n = 135) or toloxatone, 1000 mg/day (n = 133) for 28 days. Both groups showed a significant clinical improvement while on therapy; the response was most marked and rapid in those receiving moclobemide treatment. Improvement was greatest in those patients with the most severe depression at the time of trial onset. A significantly higher number of patients returned to normal sleep patterns following moclobemide treatment than following toloxatone. Overall, tolerance was rated as good or very good in more than 80% of patients. The most frequent complaints in the moclobemide-treated group were hot flushes, dry mouth, constipation and headache, while an increase in anxiety was associated with toloxatone usage. Moclobemide was found to be as effective as toloxatone in the treatment of major depressive episodes, but with the advantages of improved sleep patterns and reduced anxiety.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sleep was observed to be better with moclobemide (450mg) than with toloxatone (100mg).
“(Sogaard et al., 1999) found that moclobemide (300-450mg) was associated with poorer BFW scores on LSEQ than sertraline, while sleep was observed to better with moclobemide (450mg) than with toloxatone (100mg; (Lemoine and Mirabaud, 1992)).”
From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Lemoine and Mirabaud, 1992
In depressed patients, significantly more of the moclobemide group showed improved sleep patterns than the toloxatone group.
“Sig more MOC group showed improved sleep patterns than TOL”
From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Lemoine, 1992
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antidepressants and their effect on sleep
Mayers, A. G., & Baldwin, D. S. (2005) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.726 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemoine, P., & Mirabaud, C.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (FR)
- Roche (France) (FR)
- ORCID
- Lemoine, P.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S118-S119
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2030991730
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
- Keywords
- moclobemide, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, sleep disorders, anxiety, adverse drug reactions, outpatients, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase B inhibitors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Benzamides, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Outpatients, Oxazoles, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Moclobemide, Oxazolidinones
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review