The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colonisation patterns of root tissues byPhytophthora nicotianae var.parasitica related to reduced disease in mycorrhizal tomato
Open accessAbstract
Tomato plants pre-colonised by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungusGlomus mosseae showed decreased root damage by the pathogenPhytophthora nicotianae var.parasitica. In analyses of the cellular bases of their bioprotective effect, a prerequisite for cytological investigations of tissue interactions betweenG. mosseae andP. nicotianae v.parasitica was to discriminate between the hyphae of the two fungi within root tissues. We report the use of antibodies as useful tools, in the absence of an appropriate stain for distinguishing hyphae ofP. nicotianae v.parasitica from those ofG. mosseae inside roots, and present observations on the colonisation patterns by the pathogenic fungus alone or during interactions in mycorrhizal roots. Infection intensity of the pathogen, estimated using an immunoenzyme labelling technique on whole root fragments, was lower in mycorrhizal roots. Immunogold labelling ofP. nicotianae v.parasitica on cross-sections of infected tomato roots showed that inter or intracellular hyphae developed mainly in the cortex, and their presence induced necrosis of host cells, the wall and contents of which showed a strong autofluorescence in reaction to the pathogen. In dual fungal infections of tomato root systems, hyphae of the symbiont and the pathogen were in most cases in different root regions, but they could also be observed in the same root tissues. The number ofP. nicotianae v.parasitica hyphae growing in the root cortex was greatly reduced in mycorrhizal root systems, and in mycorrhizal tissues infected by the pathogen, arbuscule-containing cells surrounded by intercellularP. nicotianae v.parasitica hyphae did not necrose and only a weak autofluorescence was associated with the host cells. Results are discussed in relation to possible processes involved in the phenomenon of bioprotection in arbuscular mycorrhizal plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere
Whipps, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/52.suppl_1.487 · Cited by 1,934
Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens
Whipps, J. M. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b04-082 · Cited by 508
Methods for Management of Soilborne Diseases in Crop Production
Panth, M., Hassler, S. C., & Baysal-Gurel, F. (2020) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture10010016 · Cited by 455
Pozo, M. J., Cordier, C., Dumas‐Gaudot, E., Gianinazzi, S., Barea, J. M., & Azcón‐Aguilar, C. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.368.525 · Cited by 447
Self-citationCordier, C., Pozo, M. J., Barea, J. M., Gianinazzi, S., & Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. (1998) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi.1998.11.10.1017 · Cited by 386
Self-citationInterplant Communication of Tomato Plants through Underground Common Mycorrhizal Networks
Song, Y. Y., Zeng, R. S., Xu, J. F., Li, J., Shen, X., & Yihdego, W. G. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013324 · Cited by 305
Review Paper: Arbuscular Mycorrhiza: Biological, Chemical, and Molecular Aspects
Strack, D., Fester, T., Hause, B., Schliemann, W., & Walter, M. H. (2003) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1025695032113 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Cordier, C., Gianinazzi, S., & Gianinazzi-Pearson, V.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-232
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2026480857
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.