The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fundamental Factors of Comprehension in Reading
Abstract
A survey of the literature was made to determine the skills involved in reading comprehension that are deemed most important by authorities. Multiple-choice test items were constructed to measure each of nine skills thus identified as basic. The intercorrelations of the nine skill scores were factored, each skill being weighted in the initial matrix roughly in proportion to its importance in reading comprehension, as judged by authorities. The principal components were rather readily interpretable in terms of the initial variables. Individual scores in components I and II are sufficiently reliable to warrant their use for practical purposes, and useful measures of other components could be provided by constructing the required number of additional items. The results also indicate need for workbooks to aid in improving students' use of basic reading skills. The study provides more detailed information regarding the skills measured by the Cooperative Reading Comprehension Tests than has heretofore been provided regarding the skills actually measured by any other widely used reading test. Statistical techniques for estimating the reliability coefficients of individual scores in principal-axes components, for determining whether component variances are greater than would be yielded by chance, and for calculating the significance of the differences between successive component variances are illustrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
The instruction of reading comprehension
Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/0361-476x(83)90019-x · Cited by 1,177
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888430802132279 · Cited by 668
Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom
BLACHOWICZ, C. L. Z., FISHER, P. J. L., OGLE, D., & WATTS‐TAFFE, S. (2006) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.41.4.5 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, F. B.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1944-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-197
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2029935589
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fundamental Factors of Comprehension in Reading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02288722
- The paper
- Davis, F. B. (1944). Fundamental Factors of Comprehension in Reading. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.