The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Note on the “Correction for Continuity” in Testing the Significance of the Difference between Correlated Proportions
Abstract
Methods of correcting for continuity in tests of significance of the difference between correlated proportions are presented. These corrections should increase the range of usefulness of the formulas developed by McNemar (1).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages
McNemar, Q. (1947) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295996 · Cited by 4,754
Cited by
Fagerland, M. W., Lydersen, S., & Laake, P. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-91 · Cited by 403
Koutsouleris, N., Kambeitz-Ilankovic, L., Ruhrmann, S., Rosen, M., Ruef, A., Dwyer, D. B., Paolini, M., Chisholm, K., Kambeitz, J., Haidl, T., et al. (2018) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2165 · Cited by 341
Statistical methods applied to Rorschach scores: a review.
Cronbach, L. J. (1949) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0059467 · Cited by 301
(2017) · doi:10.3389/fncom.2016.00131 · Cited by 59
Personality perception of robot avatar tele-operators
Bremner, P., Celiktutan, O., & Gunes, H. (2016) · 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451745 · Cited by 36
Alsayed, A. R., Abed, A., Khader, H. A., Hasoun, L., Al Maqbali, M., & Al Shawabkeh, M. J. (2024) · Libyan Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1080/19932820.2024.2307679 · Cited by 12
Teuho, J., Schultz, J., Klén, R., Juarez-Orozco, L. E., Knuuti, J., Saraste, A., Ono, N., & Kanaya, S. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.101889 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, A. L.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1948-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-187
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2086148793
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
