The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Polyserial Correlation Coefficient
Abstract
The polyserial and point polyserial correlations are discussed as generalizations of the biserial and point biserial correlations. The relationship between the polyserial and point polyserial correlation is derived. The maximum likelihood estimator of the polyserial correlation is compared with a two-step estimator and with a computationally convenient ad hoc estimator. All three estimators perform reasonably well in a Monte Carlo simulation. Some practical applications of the polyserial correlation are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient
Olsson, U. (1979) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296207 · Cited by 1,127
Self-citation
Cited by
A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks
Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000167 · Cited by 2,918
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/63.2.482 · Cited by 1,731
Classroom Belonging among Early Adolescent Students: Relationships to Motivation and Achievement
Goodenow, C. (1993) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431693013001002 · Cited by 1,614
Muthén, B. (1984) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294210 · Cited by 1,544
HTMT2–an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling
Roemer, E., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2021) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-02-2021-0082 · Cited by 630
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsson, U., Drasgow, F., & Dorans, N. J.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1982-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 337-347
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2086604918
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
