The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating Multiple Classification Latent Class Models
Abstract
This paper presents a new class of models for persons-by-items data. The essential new feature of this class is the representation of the persons: every person is represented by its membership to multiple latent classes, each of which belongs to one latent classification. The models can be considered as a formalization of the hypothesis that the responses come about in a process that involves the application of a number of mental operations. Two algorithms for maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation are described. They both make use of the tractability of the complete data likelihood to maximize the observed data likelihood. Properties of the MAP estimators (i.e., uniqueness and goodness-of-recovery) and the existence of asymptotic standard errors were examined in a simulation study. Then, one of these models is applied to the responses to a set of fraction addition problems. Finally, the models are compared to some related models in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,125
Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice.
Beniger, J. R., Bishop, Y. M. M., Feinberg, S. E., Holland, P. W., Light, R. J., & Mosteller, F. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2063625 · Cited by 5,108
An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics
(1911) · Nature · doi:10.1038/087345a0 · Cited by 4,394
Sivia, D. S. (1996) · Cited by 2,669
Mayer, T. F., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1969) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092222 · Cited by 2,384
Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Item Parameters: Application of an EM Algorithm
Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02293801 · Cited by 2,339
Finding the Observed Information Matrix When Using the EM Algorithm
Louis, T. A. (1982) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1982.tb01203.x · Cited by 2,229
Gill, P. E., Murray, W., & Wright, M. H. (2019) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611975604 · Cited by 1,737
Cited by
AI-assisted knowledge assessment techniques for adaptive learning environments
Minn, S. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100050 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Maris, E.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-212
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2054855387
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Multiple Classification Latent Class Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02294535
- The paper
- Maris, E. (1999). Estimating Multiple Classification Latent Class Models. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.