Chronic opioids impair acquisition of both radial maze and Y-maze choice escape
Abstract
Chronic morphine impaired acquisition of two dissimilar behavioral tasks. In the radial maze, the performance of saline-treated and morphine-treated groups diverged with the latter failing to improve despite extensive training. In contrast, rats treated with naltrexone became skilled in the procedure 2-4 times as rapidly as saline controls. Withdrawal of treatment significantly improved performance of morphine-treated rats, with no change for rats treated with saline or naltrexone. When a second group of rats was extensively trained prior to instituting chronic morphine treatment, performance scores were not affected, suggesting that morphine does not impair spatial working memory despite subjective evidence of other gross behavioral effects, such as ataxia. In the Y-maze choice escape task, acquisition of a response strategy was significantly impaired in rats that had been previously treated with morphine for 17-21 days, despite clear indications that morphine-treated rats were sensitive to the aversive stimulus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Treatment with opioid agonists interferes with acquisition of spatial memories.
“Specifically, treatment with opioid agonists have been reported to interfere with acquisition (Spain and Newsom, 1991;Zhu et al., 2011) and retrieval (Zhu et al., 2011) of spatial memories, and to disrupt working memory (Itoh et al., 1994), avoidance learning (Aguilar et al., 1998;Ukai et al., 1997;Zarrindast and Rezayof, 2004), and spatial recognition memory (Ma et al., 2007).”
From A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions (2016) · cites this paper as Spain and Newsom, 1991
Cites
Opiate antagonists improve spatial memory
Gallagher, M., King, R. A., & Young, N. B. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6879198 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McKinnon, M. C., Boyd, J. E., Frewen, P. A., Lanius, U. F., Jetly, R., Richardson, J. D., & Lanius, R. A. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.017 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“treatment with opioid agonists have been reported to interfere with acquisition (Spain and Newsom, 1991; Zhu et al., 2011) and”
- Authors
- Spain, J. W., & Newsom, G. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago, Rockford campus (US)
- ORCID
- Spain, James W.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-106
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2030037258
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- chronic morphine, radial maze, naltrexone, spatial working memory, aversive stimuli, drug withdrawal, ataxia
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Animal, Cognition, Drug Tolerance, Electroshock, Learning, Morphine, Naltrexone, Narcotics, Reaction Time, Sensory Thresholds, Vocalization, Animal, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review