Cited by 97Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementPlant Ecology and Soil Science

A survey of trampling effects on vegetation and soil in eight tropical and subtropical sites

Sun, Dan, Liddle, Michael J.·1993·Environmental Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02394665

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Sun, D., & Liddle, M. J.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Venue
Environmental Management
Published
1993-07
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
497-510
ISSN
  • 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1009
OpenAlex
W1973204988
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Plant Ecology and Soil Science
Keywords
trampling, recreation impacts, vegetation damage, soil compaction, soil penetration resistance, soil organic matter, plant diversity, plant height, leaf morphology, tussock grasses, Cynodon dactylon, Eragrostis tenuifolia, Queensland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review