Quadratic differentials and foliations
Open accessAbstract
This paper concerns the interplay between the complex of a Riemann surface and the essentially Euclidean geometry induced by a quadratic differential. One aspect of this geometry is the trajectory structure of a quadratic differential which has long played a central role in Teichmfiller theory starting with Teichmiiller's proof of the existence and uniqueness of extremal maps. Ahlfors and Bers later gave proofs of that result. In other contexts, Jenkins and Strebel have studied quadratic differentials with closed trajectories. Starting from the dynamical problem of studying diffeomorphisms on a C ~ surface M, Thurston [17] invented measured ]ol~t io~. These are foliations with certain kinds of singularities and an invariantly defined transverse measure. A precise definition is given in Chapter I, w 1. This notion turns out to be the correct abstraction of the trajectory and metric induced by a quadratic differential. In this language our main statement says that given any measured ]oliation F on M and any complex X on M, there is a unique quadratic diHerential on the Riemann surface X whose horizontal trajectory realizes F. In particular any trajectory on one Riemann surface occurs uniquely on every Riemann surface of that genus. In the special case when the foliation has closed leaves, an analogous theorem was proved by Strebel [15]. Earlier Jenkins [13] had proved that quadratic differentials with closed trajectories existed as solutions of certain extremal problems. We deduce Strebel's theorem from ours in Chapter I, w 3. By identifying the space of measured foliations with the quadratic forms on a fixed Riemann surface, we are able to give an analytic and entirely different proof of a result of Thurston's [17]; that the space of projective classes of measured foliations is homeomorphic to a sphere. This is also done in Chapter I, w 3.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Michael Wolf [30] obtained a compactification of Teichmüller space through holomorphic quadratic differentials and proved that his compactification is equivalent to the Thurston compactification.
“Note that Michael Wolf [30] obtained a compactification of Teichmüller space through the use of holomorphic quadratic differentials and he proved that his compactification is indeed equivalent to the Thurston compactification.”
From Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space (2023) · cites this paper as [30]
The Applications section discusses boundaries of Teichmüller space arising from quadratic differentials and measured foliations, and says their topologies do not coincide. It does not discuss Michael Wolf’s compactification or whether that construction is equivalent to Thurston’s; searches for Wolf and the claimed equivalence found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn Wolf's analysis, the transverse measure associated with the horizontal foliation collapses asymptotically.
“In the analysis of Wolf [30], it is shown that this transverse measure associated with the horizontal foliation collapses asymptotically.”
From Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space (2023) · cites this paper as [30]
Chapter II, §2 defines transverse measure for a measured foliation, and the passage on quasi-transversal curves discusses transverse length. Neither addresses Wolf’s analysis or an asymptotic collapse of the transverse measure. Searches for Wolf, horizontal foliation, and asymptotic collapse found no passage establishing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- AHLFORS, L., On quasiconformal mappings. Journal d'Anedyse Math., (1954), 1-54.
- ATIYA~, M. F., BOTT, R. & Gih~nI~G, L., Lacuna for hyperbolic differential operators II. Acta Math., 131 (1973), 145-205.
- B~RS, L., Quasiconformal Mappings and Teichraiiller's Theorem in Analytic /unctions. R. Nevanlinna et al., eds., Princeton University Press, 1960.
- DIEUDONI~, J., Foundations o] Modern Analysis. Academic Press. New York, 1960.
- DOU~-DY, A. & HUBBARD, J., On the density of Strebel differentials. Inventiones Math., 30 (1975), 175-179.
- EARLE, C. & EEI~S, J., A fibre bundle description of Teiehmtiller theory. J.Di/1erential Geometry, 3 (1969), 19-45.
- EPS~IN, D., Curves on 2-manifolds and isotopies. Acta Math., 115 (1966), 83-107.
- GUNninG, R., Lectures on Riemann Sur/aces. Princeton University Press, (1966).
- HUBBARD, J. & MASUR, H., On the existence and uniqueness of Strebel differentials. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 82 (1976), 77-79.
- JEN~NS, J. A., On the existence of certain general extremal metrics. Ann. o] Math., 66 (1957), 440-453.
- KERCKHOFF, S., The Asymptotic Geometry of Teichmiiller Space, Thesis, Princeton University, 1978.
- STP~EB~.L, K., ~ber quadratische differentials mit geschlossen trajectorien and extremale quasikonforme abbildungen. In Festband zum 70. (~cburstag yon Roll 1Vsvanlinna, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1966.
- THUBSTON, W., On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphisms of surfaces. Preprint. Received July 5, 1978
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space
Mondal, P. (2023) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0136631 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hubbard, J., & Masur, H.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Masur, Howard
- Venue
- Acta Mathematica
- Publisher
- International Press of Boston
- Published
- 1979
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 221-274
- ISSN
- 0001-5962 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021821678
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Acta Mathematica (publishedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Analytic and geometric function theory
- Keywords
- quadratic differentials, measured foliations, Riemann surfaces, Teichmüller theory, closed trajectories, extremal problems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review