The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03203267 · Cited by 7,230
Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4023713 · Cited by 2,433
Cited by
Disability and Discourses of Web Accessibility
Adam, A., & Kreps, D. (2009) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180802552940 · Cited by 88
Food Perception and Categorization
Foroni, F., & Rumiati, R. I. (2017) · Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-101107-2.00012-9 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Howard, L. A., & Tipper, S. P.
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 144-152
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- OpenAlex
- W1981637744
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02454150
- The paper
- Howard, L. A., & Tipper, S. P. (1997). Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition. Experimental Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02454150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
