The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How we know universals the perception of auditory and visual forms
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Object Detection With Deep Learning: A Review
Zhao, Z.-Q., Zheng, P., Xu, S.-T., & Wu, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2876865 · Cited by 5,545
What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain
Lettvin, J., Maturana, H., McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1959) · Proceedings of the IRE · doi:10.1109/jrproc.1959.287207 · Cited by 1,990
Self-citationOlshausen, B., Anderson, C., & Van Essen, D. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-11-04700.1993 · Cited by 908
Is perception discrete or continuous?
VanRullen, R., & Koch, C. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00095-0 · Cited by 662
Dynamic Model of Visual Recognition Predicts Neural Response Properties in the Visual Cortex
Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.4.721 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitts, W., & McCulloch, W. S.
- Venue
- The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics
- Published
- 1947-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 127-147
- ISSN
- 0092-8240 (ISSN-L)
- 0007-4985
- 1522-9602
- OpenAlex
- W118296737
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How we know universals the perception of auditory and visual forms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02478291
- The paper
- Pitts, W., & McCulloch, W. S. (1947). How we know universals the perception of auditory and visual forms. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02478291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
