The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace
Abstract
A comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace posits that empowerment mediates the relationship between the social structural context and behavioral outcomes. The social structural context is operationalized as perceptions of role ambiguity, sociopolitical support, access to strategic information and resources, and work unit culture, whereas behavioral outcomes are operationalized as innovativeness and effectiveness. The model is examined on a sample of 324 middle managers from different units of a Fortune 50 organization. Survey data are examined using a series of regression analyses to assess the mediating effect of intrapersonal. Results suggest that intrapersonal empowerment mediates the relationship between some elements of workplace social structure and innovativeness, but not effectiveness. Although not a mediating mechanism for effectiveness, intrapersonal empowerment is nonetheless directly related to effectiveness (as assessed by the respondent's subordinates). Implications of the results are discussed as are study limitations and directions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02506983 · Cited by 2,317
Cited by
A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects
GILBOA, S., SHIROM, A., FRIED, Y., & COOPER, C. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x · Cited by 1,072
Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case study approach
Maton, K. I., & Salem, D. A. (1995) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02506985 · Cited by 414
Qing, M., Asif, M., Hussain, A., & Jameel, A. (2020) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-019-00340-9 · Cited by 303
Sutton, L., Rowe, S., Hammerton, G., & Billings, J. (2022) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2021.2022278 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Spreitzer, G. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 601-629
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- OpenAlex
- W2034285317
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
