The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A randomized trial of visual attention of preterm infants fed docosahexaenoic acid until nine months
Abstract
This randomized, double‐blind trial tested the hypothesis that the addition of 0.2% docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22∶6n−3) from marine oil to commercially‐available preterm and term formulas with ≥3% linolenic acid (18∶3n−3) would enhance novelty preference and visual attention of preterm infants. Among preterm infants cared for in our center, study infants were a select group considered to be at lower risk for developmental delay. Study infants received their assigned diet (control, DHA‐supplemented) from a mean postnatal age of 25 d until 9 mon past term. At 6.5, 9, and 12 mon past term, they were tested for visual recognition memory (novelty preference) and attention with the Fagan Test of Infant Intelligence. The effects of DHA supplementation were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance. In paired comparisons of novel and familiar stimuli, DHA‐supplemented and control infants had the same novelty preference, but supplemented infants had more discrete looks to both novel (P<0.03) and familiar (P<0.02) stimuli and a shorter overall look duration (P<0.03). These data are analogous to those from n−3‐deficient and n−3‐fed monkeys in that the group with better DHA status had shorter overall look duration. Because shorter look duration has been associated with more rapid information processing, preterm infants fed formulas with only linolenic acid may have had slower information processing than those fed DHA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of action of docosahexaenoic acid in the nervous system
Salem, N., Litman, B., Kim, H., & Gawrisch, K. (2001) · Lipids · doi:10.1007/s11745-001-0805-6 · Cited by 919
Birch, E. E., Hoffman, D. R., Uauy, R., Birch, D. G., & Prestidge, C. (1998) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/00006450-199808000-00011 · Cited by 494
Oken, E., Radesky, J. S., Wright, R. O., Bellinger, D. C., Amarasiriwardena, C. J., Kleinman, K. P., Hu, H., & Gillman, M. W. (2008) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwn034 · Cited by 423
Towards establishing dietary reference intakes for eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids
Harris, W. S., Mozaffarian, D., Lefevre, M., Toner, C. D., Colombo, J., Cunnane, S. C., Holden, J. M., Klurfeld, D. M., Morris, M. C., & Whelan, J. (2009) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.108.101329 · Cited by 356
Dietary essential fatty acids and brain function: a developmental perspective on mechanisms
Wainwright, P. E. (2002) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2001130 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Werkman, S. H., & Carlson, S. E.
- Venue
- Lipids
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1Part1
- Pages
- 91-97
- ISSN
- 0024-4201 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9307
- OpenAlex
- W4241765588
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized trial of visual attention of preterm infants fed docosahexaenoic acid until nine months. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02522417
- The paper
- Werkman, S. H., & Carlson, S. E. (1996). A randomized trial of visual attention of preterm infants fed docosahexaenoic acid until nine months. Lipids. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02522417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.