The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Response of microbial populations to environmental disturbance
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Insights into the resistance and resilience of the soil microbial community
Griffiths, B. S., & Philippot, L. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00343.x · Cited by 1,117
How Stable Is Stable? Function versus Community Composition
Fernández, A., Huang, S., Seston, S., Xing, J., Hickey, R., Criddle, C., & Tiedje, J. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.8.3697-3704.1999 · Cited by 522
Total bacterial diversity in soil and sediment communities—A review
Torsvik, V, Sørheim, R., & Goksøyr, J. (1996) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf01574690 · Cited by 517
Marilley, L., & Aragno, M. (1999) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(99)00028-1 · Cited by 317
The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots
De Leij, F. A. A. M., Whipps, J. M., & Lynch, J. M. (1994) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf00170116 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Atlas, R. M., Horowitz, A., Krichevsky, M., & Bej, A. K.
- Venue
- Microbial Ecology
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 249-256
- ISSN
- 0095-3628 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-184X
- OpenAlex
- W1983549579
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of microbial populations to environmental disturbance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02540227
- The paper
- Atlas, R. M., Horowitz, A., Krichevsky, M., & Bej, A. K. (1991). Response of microbial populations to environmental disturbance. Microbial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02540227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
