Continuous fat splitting plants using the colgate‐emery process
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Steam splitting via the Colgate-Emery process is the current industrial standard, employing temperatures of 250-330°C and reaction times of 2-3 h.
“Steam splitting via the Colgate-Emery process is the current industrial standard, employing temperatures of 250-330°C and reaction times of 2-3 h (81).”
From Catalytic Hydroprocessing of Single-Cell Oils to Hydrocarbon Fuels: Converting microbial lipids to fuels is a promising approach to replace fossil fuels (2021) · cites this paper as [81]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Barnebey, H. L., & Brown, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Blaw‐Knox Company Pittsburgh Pa.
- Emery Industries, Inc. Cincinnati Ohio
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1948-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 95-99
- ISSN
- 0003-021X (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9331
- OpenAlex
- W2057918281
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
- Keywords
- fat splitting, continuous process, lipolysis, free fatty acids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
