Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 558

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimation and information in stationary time series

Whittle, P.·1953·Arkiv för Matematik

Abstract

Section (1) is devoted to a discussion of the model-fitting problem, which finds its explicit solution in equation (1.13). In section (2) the maximum likelihood, (ML), estimates of the model parameters are investigated, and for the class of series considered shown to possess the same optimum properties as in the case of independent series. Next, the covariance matrix of the parameter estimates is expressed in terms of the spectral function of the generating process (eq. 3.7). The last section is concerned with certain working approximations to the ML statistics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02590998

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 558

Metadata

Authors
Whittle, P.
Venue
Arkiv för Matematik
Published
1953-08
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
423-434
ISSN
0004-2080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997927852
Cited by
558
References
6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.