Cited by 2,660

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity

Israel, W.·1966·Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 10

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02710419

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The semi-analytic arguments based on the Israel thin-wall formalism could only apply to a very small and artificial region of parameter space within a quantum gravity corrected Higgs potential.

    “However, the semi-analytic arguments we used (based on the Israel”

    From The fate of the Higgs vacuum (2016) · cites this paper as [23]

  • One may replace the brane action with a non-minimally coupled dilaton theory, e.g., Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) gravity.

    “For example, one may replace the brane action (3.11) with a non-minimally coupled dilaton theory, e.g., Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) grav-ity [78,79], as done in [53].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

  • Taking the bulk to be AdS d+1 with an AdS d Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) brane, the entropy of the boundary CFT vacuum reduced to a boundary region A is given by S vN (A) = min γ ext γ Area(γ) 4G d+1 + Area(γ ∩ brane) 4G d .

    “Taking the bulk to be AdS d+1 with an AdS d Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) brane [261] (where the brane action includes, e.g., its own Einstein-Hilbert term), the entropy of the boundary CFT vacuum reduced to a boundary region A is given by [53]”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

  • The argument of [53,260] requires DGP couplings be turned on, couplings which can affect the growth rate of entanglement entropy of subregions of the dual CFT.

    “The argument of[53,260] requires DGP couplings be turned on, couplings which can affect the growth rate of entanglement entropy of subregions of the dual CFT[263].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

  • In the context of topological black holes on the brane, the bulk is d+1-dimensional AdS-Rindler, for which the Rindler horizon induces a Rindler horizon on the brane.

    “Alternatively, one can study topological black holes on the brane, e.g.,[53,65].In this context, the bulk is d + 1-dimensional AdS-Rindler, for which the Rindler horizon induces a Rindler horizon on the brane.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. J. R. Oppenheimer andH. Snyder:Phys. Rev.,56, 455 (1939);F. Hoyle andJ. V. Narlikar:Proc. Roy. Soc., A278, 465 (1964);C. W. Misner andD.H. Sharp:Phys. Rev.,136, B 571 (1964);G. C. McVittie:Astrophys. Journ.,140, 409 (1964);H. Nariai andK. Tomita:Progr. Theor. Phys.,34, 155 (1965). · DOI
  2. C. Lanczos:Phys. Zeits.,23, 539 (1922);Ann. der Phys.,74, 518 (1924). See alsoN. Sen:Ann. der Phys.,73, 365 (1924).
  3. Boundary surfaces:A. H. Taub:Ill. Journ. Math.,1, 370 (1957);N. Coburn:Journ. Math. and Mech.,10, 361 (1961);R. Abraham:Journ. Math. and Mech.,11, 553 (1962);D. G. B. Edelen andT. Y. Thomas:Journ. Math. Anal. Appl.,7, 247 (1963);G. Dautcourt:Arch. Rat. Mech. and Anal.,13, 55 (1963);H. Nariai:Progr. Theor. Phys.,34, 173 (1965). Surface layers:G. Dautcourt:Math. Nachr.,27, 277 (1964). This reference also treatsnull surface layers (e.g. shells of photons), an important topic which lies outside the scope of the present work. · DOI
  4. A. Lichnerowicz:Théories Relativistes de la Gravitation et de l’Electromagnétisme (Paris, 1955). Also:J. L. Synge:Relativity: The General Theory (Amsterdam, 1960), p. 39;W. Israel:Proc. Roy. Soc., A248, 404 (1958).
  5. H. P. Robertson:Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc.,5, 63 (1937);L. Infeld andA. Schild:Rev. Mod. Phys.,21, 408 (1949);A. H. Taub:Journ. Math. Phys.,5, 112 (1964). · DOI
  6. H. Weyl:Raum, Zeit, Materie, 5th edition, Sect.36 (Berlin, 1923);L. Infeld andJ. Plebanski:Motion and Relativity, Sect.I-6, (New York, 1960);W. B. Bonnor andN. S. Swaminarayan:Zeits. Phys.,177, 240 (1964). For critical comments, seeM. Carmeli:Phys. Lett.,11, 24 (1964).
  7. W. Israel:Gravitational Collapse of a Spherical Shell and the Problem of Causality, Preprint Series A, No. 45, Mathematics Department, University of Alberta. (October 1965).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Israel, W.
Venue
Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 10
Published
1966-07
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0369-3554
  • 1826-9877
Cited by
2,660
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review