Female age: male preference and reproductive success in primates
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low reproductive success among young females is a general primate phenomenon.
“Low reproductive success among young females is a general primate phenomenon (52).”
From Emerging Adulthood, a Pre-adult Life-History Stage (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
Male preference for fully developed adult females has been described in 15 primate species.
“Male preference for fully developed adult females has been described in 15 primate species (52).”
From Emerging Adulthood, a Pre-adult Life-History Stage (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 146
- Authors
- Anderson, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Anderson, Connie M.
- ORCID
- Anderson, Connie M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Primatology
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 305-326
- ISSN
- 0164-0291 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-8604
- OpenAlex
- W1984675986
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 24.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Primatology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- maternal age, male preference, reproductive success, parity, sexual selection, primate mating systems, age at first reproduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
