Purification and characterization of the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II from chicken forebrain
Abstract
CaM kinase II is known to be enriched in mammalian and avian brains. To determine the holoenzymic composition and functional characteristics of this kinase, a new approach for isolation was applied to isolate it from the chicken forebrain. Forebrains of hatched 45-d chicken were dissected, homogenized, and centrifuged. The supernatant was loaded onto a CaM-agarose affinity column and the calmodulin-binding proteins were eluted with EGTA. Selected eluates were loaded onto the antibody-agarose affinity column, which was prepared with monoclonal antibody (MAb) (6G9) to the CaM kinase II alpha subunit. Samples were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and either silver-stained or blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The protein composition and the immunoreactivity of the antibody-agarose affinity eluate fractions were analyzed with a densitometric scanner. Silver staining of gels showed that the beta subunit doublet, the beta' subunit, and a putative substrate were coeluted with the alpha subunit from the antibody affinity column although only the alpha subunit bound the 6G9 antibody. Scintillation counting showed that the autophosphorylation of the kinase was significantly reduced in the eluate from the antibody affinity column. Whereas silver staining indicated an increase in the relative amount of alpha subunit had occurred during purification, phosphorylation assays indicated an increase in the relative amount of the alpha subunit after the last p…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the forebrain the ratio is roughly 3 α to 1 β, and holoenzymes are composed of both subunits.
“In the forebrain the ratio is roughly 3 α to 1 β, and holoenyzmes are composed of both subunits (155–157).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [157]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nicoll, R. A., & Schulman, H. (2023) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2022 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“In the forebrain the ratio is roughly 3 a to 1 b , and holoenyzmes are composed of both subunits (155 – 157).”
Background
- Authors
- Liu, N., & Cooper, N. G. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- ORCID
- Cooper, Nigel G. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-206
- ISSN
- 0895-8696 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2005577240
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (EY02708)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › S100 Proteins and Annexins
- Keywords
- calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, heteropolymers, enzyme purification, calmodulin-binding proteins, autophosphorylation, cytosolic kinase
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Calmodulin, Chickens, Chromatography, Affinity, Densitometry, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Molecular Weight, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Phosphorylation, Protein Conformation, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Prosencephalon, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinases, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review