Cited by 331Forest ecology and managementSeedling growth and survival studiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Forest Gap Dynamics and Tree Regeneration

Yamamoto, Shin-Ichi·2000·Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

When one or a few canopy trees die (or are injured) in a forest, small openings, which are called ‘gaps,’ are formed in the forest canopy and are then filled with other trees. This sort of forest dynamics is termed gap dynamics; a large number of papers and data on gap dynamics have been accumulated since the 1970's, and gap dynamics has been described in many forest types. In this review, I introduce the basic concepts of gap dynamics and summarize major issues on gap dynamics relating to tree regeneration, with many references. Although enormous studies on gap dynamics of natural forests have been conducted, applications of gap dynamics to forest practice are limited. However, accumulated knowledge on gap dynamics should be useful for sustainable forest ecosystem management, as much of the literature suggests.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02767114

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Barnes B.V., 1998, Forest ecology
  2. Falinski J.B., 1978, Oikos, 38, 175
  3. Hartshorn G.S., 1978, Tropical trees as living systems, 617
  4. Hubbell S.P., 1986, Plant ecology, 77
  5. Kimmins J.P., 2000, Forest ecology
  6. Mueller-Dombois D., 1974, Aims and methods of vegetation ecology
  7. Nakashizuka T., 1984, Jpn. J. Ecol., 34, 75
  8. Nakashizuka T., 1982, Jpn. J. Ecol., 32, 57
  9. Orians G.H., 1982, Trop. Ecol., 23, 255
  10. Whitmore T.C., 1975, Tropical rain forest of the far east
  11. Whitmore T.C., 1978, Tropical trees as living systems, 639
  12. Yamamoto S., 1981, Biol. Sci. (Tokyo), 33, 8
  13. Yamamoto S., 2000, Nat. History Res., Spec. Issue, 4, 127
  14. Yamamoto S., 1999, Nagoya Univ. For. Sci., 18, 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Yamamoto, S.-I.
Affiliations
Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Yamamoto, Shin-Ichi
Venue
Journal of Forest Research
Published
2000-11
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
223-229
ISSN
  • 1341-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-7403
OpenAlex
W2084057070
Cited by
331
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest ecology and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
gap dynamics, tree regeneration, forest gaps, natural forest dynamics, sustainable forest management, forest ecosystem management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forest Gap Dynamics and Tree Regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02767114
The paper
Yamamoto, S.-I. (2000). Forest Gap Dynamics and Tree Regeneration. Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02767114