Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic relationships among domesticated and wild sunflowers (Helianthus annuus, Asteraceae)

Arias, D. M., Rieseberg, L. H.·1995·Economic Botany

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02862340

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Asch, D. L. 1993. Common sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): the pathway toward domestication. Symposium presentation, 58th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, St. Louis, MO.
  2. Fritsch, P. F., and L. H. Rieseberg. n.d. The use of random amplified polymorphic DNA in conservation genetics.In T. B. Smith and B. Wayne, eds., Molecular genetic approaches in conservation. Oxford University Press, New York.
  3. Gilmore, M. R. 1913. Some native Nebraska plants with their use by the Dakota. Nebraska State History Society 17:358–370.
  4. —. 1978. Taxonomy ofHelianthus and origin of the domesticated sunflower. Pages 31–53in J. F. Carter, ed., Sunflower science and technology. ASA, CSSA, and ASSA, Madison, WI.
  5. Lewis, P.O. 1993. GENESTAT-PC 3.3. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Arias, D. M., & Rieseberg, L. H.
Venue
Economic Botany
Published
1995-07
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
239-248
ISSN
  • 0013-0001
  • 1874-9364
Cited by
34
References
29
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.