Cited by 111Fish Biology and Ecology StudiesIchthyology and Marine BiologyMarine Ecology and Invasive Species

New records of the Red Sea fishes,Pterois miles (Scorpaenidae) andPteragogus pelycus (Labridae) from the eastern Mediterranean Sea

Golani, Daniel, Sonin, Oren·1992·Japanese Journal of Ichthyology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02906001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 8 · Cited by 111

Authors
Golani, D., & Sonin, O.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Ministry of Agriculture (ID)
Venue
Japanese Journal of Ichthyology
Published
1992-06
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
167-169
ISSN
0021-5090 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W291222577
Cited by
111
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Japanese Journal of Ichthyology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
Keywords
Pterois miles, new distribution record, Red Sea fishes, Eastern Mediterranean, Scorpaenidae, Labridae, reef fish, species distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review