Analysis of anesthesia physician resources: projected Ontario deficit in 2005
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To clarify the recent perception of shortfalls in anesthesia physician resources, two models were used to assess these resources in Ontario, Canada. Methods Two models, demand-based and benchmarking, were used. In the demand-based model estimated future supply and attrition were obtained from information on Ontario Ministry of Health funded trainees. Data from the Canadian Residents Matching Service and the Association of Canadian University Departments of Anesthesia were also used. Current demand was identified from a telephone survey of Departments of Anesthesia in ten Ontario cities. The number of anesthesia practitioners in Ontario was estimated from the 1996 Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society Physician Resource Database (CASPRD) in the demand-based model. In the benchmarking model, using Alberta as the closest published analogue to Ontario, the annual specialist growth rate in Ontario since 1986 was calculated in the literature as 2.8%/yr for 1986-1994. The number of anesthesiologists in Ontario from the 1986 CASPRD was used to calculate need based on that growth rate. Results are compared with population to anesthesiologist (P/A) ratios calculated from Statistics Canada population data and physician numbers from CASPRD. Results A shortfall in the number of anesthesiologists has been identified. The P/A ratio worsened by 17.6% from 1986 to 1996. The demand-based model indicated that the shortfall is increased from a current deficit of 40 to 68 by 2005, using CASPRD. Benchmarking showed that the estimated shortfall in 1994 was 131. Conclusion This conservative approach indicates that the shortfall in anesthesiologist physician resources will worsen by 2005.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Canada has been slow to invest in health human resource planning, and the most detailed forecasting for the anesthesia workforce is now 25 years old.
“Canada has been slow to invest in health human resource planning 17 and the most detailed forecasting for the anesthesia workforce is now 25 years old.”
From Canada needs a national strategy for anesthesia services in rural and remote regions (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Watanabe M. Physician resource planning: quest for answers. Clin Invest Med 1994; 17: 256-67.
- Roos NP, Bradley JE, Fransoo R, Shanahan M. How many physicians does Canada need to care for our aging population? CMAJ 1998; 158: 1275-84.
- Ryten E . None is too many -it's time to discard this bankrupt physician supply policy for Canada. ACMC Forum 1998; 31: 8-17.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Canada needs a national strategy for anesthesia services in rural and remote regions
Orser, B. A., & Wilson, C. R. (2020) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.200215 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, H., Byrick, R., & Donen, N.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-184
- ISSN
- 0832-610X (ISSN-L)
- 1496-8975
- OpenAlex
- W2016808842
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
- Keywords
- workforce planning, physician attrition, residency training, Ontario
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Adult, Aged, Anesthesiology, Canada, Humans, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review