Cited by 101Global Educational Reforms and InequalitiesGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsParental Involvement in Education

Examination-Oriented knowledge and value transformation in East Asian Cram Schools

Kwok, Percy·2004·Asia Pacific Education Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03026280

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwok, P.
Affiliations
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Kwok, Percy
Venue
Asia Pacific Education Review
Published
2004-02
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
64-75
ISSN
  • 1598-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-407X
OpenAlex
W2114903686
Cited by
101
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asia Pacific Education Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
Keywords
cram schools, value change, East Asian education, cultural change, educational reform, comparative education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review