CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52Economic and Environmental ValuationSocial Acceptance of Renewable EnergyElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Customer concerns about uncertainty and willingness to pay in leasing solar power systems

Open access
Shih, L. H., Chou, T. Y.·2011·International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1007/bf03326238
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03326238

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results partly contradict Shih and Chou's findings that customers are uncertain regarding emerging new technology like renewable energy sources.

    “These results partly contradict Shih and Chou's (2011) findings that customers are uncertain regarding emerging new technology, like renewable energy sources.”

    From Servitization for a Circular Economy in Construction (2025) · cites this paper as Shih and Chou's (2011)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Afroz, R.; Hanaki, K.; Hasegawa-Kurisu, K., (2009). Willingness to pay for waste management improvement in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. J. Environ. Manage., 9 0 (1), 49 2-5 03 (12 pages).
  2. Aguilar, F. X.; Cai, Z., (2010). Conjoint effect of environmental labeling, disclosure of forest of origin and price on consumer preferences for wood products in the US and UK. Ecol. Econ., 70 (2), 308-316 (9 pages).
  3. Bagnall, D. M.; Boreland, M., (2008). Photovoltaic technologies. Energ. Policy, 36 (12), 4390-4396 (7 pages).
  4. Banfi, S.; Farsi, M.; Filippini, M.; Jakob, M., (2008). Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings. Energ. Econ., 30 (2), 503-516 (14 pages).
  5. Bartels, R.; Fiebig, D. G.; McCabe, A., (2004). The value of using stated preference methods: a case study in modeling water heater choices. Math. Comput. Simulat., 64 (3-4), 487-495 (9 pages).
  6. Batley, S. L.; Colbourne, D.; Fleming, P. D.; Urwin, P., (2001). Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market. Energ. Policy, 29 (6), 479-487 (9 pages).
  7. Berger, W.; (2001). Catalysts for the diffusion of Photovoltaics __ a review of selected programs. Prog. Photovoltaics. Res. Appl., 9 (2), 145-160 (6 pages).
  8. Bergmann, A.; Hanley, N.; Wright, R., (2006). Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments. Energ. Policy, 34 (9), 1004-1014 (11 pages).
  9. Borchers, A. M.; Duke, J. M.; Parsons G. R., (2007). Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source. Energ. Policy, 35 (6), 3327-3334 (8 pages).
  10. Chau, C. K.; Sing, W. L.; Leung, T. M., (2003). An analysis on the HVAC maintenance contractors selection process. Build. Environ., 38 (4), 583-591 (9 pages).
  11. Chau, C. K.; Tse, M. S.; Chung, K. Y., (2010). A Choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes. Build. Environ., 45 (11), 2553-2561 (9 pages).
  12. Cox, D. N.; Evans, G.; Lease, H. J., (2007). The influence of information and beliefs about technology on the acceptance of novel food technologies: A conjoint study of farmed prawn concepts. J. Food. Qual. Pref., 18 (5), 813-823 (11 pages).
  13. Danielis, R.; Marcucci E.; Rotaris, L., (2005). Logistics managers stated preferences for freight service attributes. Transport Res. E-log., 41 (3), 201-215 (15 pages).
  14. Enneking, U.; Neumann, C.; Henneberg, S., (2007). How important intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes affect purchase decision, J. Food. Qual. Pref., 18 (1), 133-138 (6 pages).
  15. Green, P. E.; Srinivasan V., (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. J. Market., 54 (4), 3-19 (17 pages).
  16. Hansla, A.; Gamble, A.; Juliusson, A.; Garling, T., (2008). Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity. Energ. Policy, 36 (2), 768-774 (7 pages).
  17. Hoffmann, W.; Pietruszko, S. M.; Viaud, M., (2004). Towards an effective European indu strial policy for PV solar electricity. In PVSEC, 19 th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition. Paris, France, June 10 th .
  18. Hurlimann, A.; McKay J., (2007). Urban Australians using recycled water for domestic non-potable use-An evaluation of the attributes price, saltiness, color and odor using conjoint analysis. Environ. Manage., 83 (1), 93-104 (12 pages).
  19. Imandoust, S. B.; Gadam, S. N., (2007). Are people willing to pay for river water quality, Contingent valuation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4 (3), 401-408 (7 pages).
  20. Karbassi, A. R.; Jafari, H. R.; Yavari, A.R.; Hoveidi, H.; Sid Kalal, H., (2010). Reduction of environmental pollution through optimization of energy use in cement industries. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7 (1), 127-134 (8 pages).
  21. Köhne, F.; Totz, C.; Wehmeyer, K., (2005). Consumer preferences for location-based service attributes-a conjoint Analysis, Int. J. Manage. Decis. Making, 6 (1), 16-32 (17 pages).
  22. Koundouri,Y.; Kountouris, K. R., (2009). Valuing a wind farm construction: A contingent valuation study in Greece Phoebe, Energ. Policy, 37 (5), 1939-1944 (6 pages).
  23. Ladenburg, J.; Dubgaard, A., (2009). Preferences of coastal zone user groups regarding the siting of offshore wind farms, Ocean. Coast. Manage., 52 (5), 233-242 (10 pages).
  24. Lockshin, L.; Jarvis, W.; Hauteville, F.; Perrouty, J., (2006). Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice. J. Food Qual. Pref., 17 (3-4), 166- 178 (12 pages).
  25. Mont, O., (2004). Product-service systems: panacea or myth? Ph.D. Dissertation, Lund University, Sweden.
  26. Mostofi, M.; Nosrat, A. H.; Pearce, J. M., (2011). Institutional scale operational symbiosis of photovoltaic and cogeneration energy systems. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 8 (1), 31-44 (14 pages).
  27. Nouri, J.; Mansouri, N.; Abbaspou r, M.; Karbassi, A. R.; Omidvari, M., (2011). Designing a developed model for assessing the disaster induced vulnerabilityvalue in educational centers. Safety Sci., 49 (5), 679-685 (7 pages).
  28. Ram, S.; Sheth, J., (1989). Consumer resistance to innovations: The marketing problem and its solutions. J. Cons. Market., 6 (2), 313-326 (14 pages).
  29. Roe B.; Teisl m. F.; Levy A.; Rissell M., (2001). US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity. Energ. Policy, 29 (11), 917-925 (9 pages).
  30. Scarpa, R.;Willis, K., (2010). Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies. Energ. Econ., 32 (1), 129-136 (8 pages).
  31. Solomon, B. D.; Johnson, N. H., (2009). Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol. Ecol. Econ., 68 (7), 2137-2144 (8 pages).
  32. Tehrani, S. M.; Karbassi, A. R.; Monavari, S. M.; Mirbagheri, S. A., (2010). Role of E-shopping management strategy in urban environment. Int. J. Environ. Res., 4 (4), 681-690 (10 pages).
  33. Wiser, R. H., (2007). Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles. Ecol. Econ., 62 (5), 419-432 (14 pages).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shih, L. H., & Chou, T. Y.
Affiliations
National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Shih, L. H.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-06
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
523-532
ISSN
  • 1735-1472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1735-2630
DOI
10.1007/bf03326238
OpenAlex
W2026850745
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • Bioline International (Bioline International) (submittedVersion)
  • Issue Lab (Candid) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
solar energy systems, consumer uncertainty, willingness to pay, product-service systems, government subsidies, electricity prices, reliability, part-worth utilities, customer segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review