Role of adrenal gland scintigraphy in patients with subclinical hypercortisolism and incidentally discovered adrenal mass
Abstract
Background The role of adrenal scintigraphy (AS) in the diagnosis of subclinical hypercortisolism (SH) in adrenal incidentaloma (AI) is debated.Aim To evaluate the possible role of AS in identifying SH in AI patients.Subjects and methods In the retrospective phase (2000-2004), 102 AI patients [71 females (F)/31 males (M)] referred to our center were reevaluated for SH. In the prospective phase (2005-2006), 42 patients (32F/10M) with suspected SH were evaluated performing AS and biochemical assessment of cortisol secretion. We report data of the prospective phase of the study. In these patients AS was performed at baseline; the difference between the uptake of the affected and the controlateral gland [mean Delta uptake (MDeltau)] was calculated. Cortisol secretion was evaluated in 3 different occasions. Patients were considered affected with SH if they presented at least twice 2 of the following criteria: urinary free cortisol >193 nmol/l, cortisol after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test >83 nmol/l, ACTH levels <2.2 pmol/l.Results MDeltau was higher in patients with SH (no.=27, 5/22 M/F) than in patients without SH (83.7+/-12.5 vs 54.7+/-24.1%, p<0.001), and directly correlated with UFC (beta=0.387, p=0.015) and was predictive of SH (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.22, p=0.009) regardless of age, body mass index, and diameter of the mass. A 75% MDeltau cut-off has 86.7% specificity and 81.5% sensitivity in diagnosing SH.Conclusions AS is not recommended as screening test in AI patients, but it can be useful to exclude the presence of a subtle cortisol excess in patients with unclear biochemical diagnosis of SH.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Difficulties in defining a follow-up protocol relate to the variability of cortisol secretion, because even a 2-year follow-up may be too short to ascertain subclinical hypercortisolism.
“The difficulties in defining a protocol are related to the variability of cortisol secretion in these patients (3,22) because even a 2-yr follow-up may be too short to ascertain the presence of SH (79).”
From Diagnosis and Treatment of Subclinical Hypercortisolism (2011) · cites this paper as [79]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Donadio, F., Morelli, V., Salcuni, A. S., Eller-Vainicher, C., Carletto, M., Castellani, M., Dellavedova, L., Scillitani, A., Beck-Peccoz, P., & Chiodini, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
- Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Chiodini, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
- Published
- 2009-06-15
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 576-580
- ISSN
- 0391-4097 (ISSN-L)
- 1720-8386
- OpenAlex
- W2038169812
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Endocrinological Investigation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
- Keywords
- adrenal scintigraphy, subclinical hypercortisolism, adrenal incidentaloma, urinary free cortisol, dexamethasone suppression test, ACTH, screening test
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adrenal Glands, Adult, Aged, Cushing Syndrome, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Radionuclide Imaging, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review