The Hallowes Site: a seventeenth-century yeoman’s cottage in Virginia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 1651 John Hallowes received a patent for 2,400 acres that included the archaeological site.
“In 1651 John Hallowes received a patent for 2,400 ac. of land that encompassed the location of the archaeological site”
From Venison Trade and Interaction between English Colonists and Native Americans in Virginia's Potomac River Valley (2012) · cites this paper as Buchanan and Heite 1971: 39
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hatch, D. B. (2012) · Northeast Historical Archaeology · doi:10.22191/neha/vol41/iss1/3
- Authors
- Buchanan, W. T., & Heite, E. F.
- Venue
- Historical Archaeology
- Published
- 1971-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-48
- ISSN
- 0440-9213 (ISSN-L)
- 2328-1103
- OpenAlex
- W2524824940
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Park Service
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
- Keywords
- seventeenth-century Virginia, colonial Virginia, residential architecture, rural settlement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
