The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
:Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology.
Curet, L. A., Dawdy, S. L., & Corzo, G. L. R. (2005) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr.110.5.1641b · Cited by 31
General History of the Caribbean
Sued-badillo, J. (2003) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-73764-2 · Cited by 18
Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology
Healy, P. F., Curet, L. A., Dawdy, S. L., & Corzo, G. L. R. (2007) · Latin American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/25063115 · Cited by 17
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Greene, T. R.
- Venue
- Historical Archaeology
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-176
- ISSN
- 0440-9213 (ISSN-L)
- 2328-1103
- OpenAlex
- W2538325601
- Semantic Scholar
- c2963bc0c977b32c599050269e2c77da1db9b964
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cuban History and Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
- Keywords
- Cuban archaeology, Cuban history, archaeology and history, historiography of archaeology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf03377018
- The paper
- Greene, T. R. (2007). Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology. Historical Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03377018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.