Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology

Greene, Tina R.·2007·Historical Archaeology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03377018

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Greene, T. R.
Venue
Historical Archaeology
Published
2007-06
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
175-176
ISSN
  • 0440-9213 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-1103
OpenAlex
W2538325601
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cuban History and Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
Cuban archaeology, Cuban history, archaeology and history, historiography of archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf03377018
The paper
Greene, T. R. (2007). Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology. Historical Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03377018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.