Derived Relational Networks and Control by Novel Instructions: A Possible Model of Generative Verbal Responding
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The REP has the advantage of allowing large numbers of stimulus relations to be trained in a short space of time using an intuitive procedure that more closely parallels the format of often well-established reading repertoires.
“This procedure has the advantage of allowing large numbers of stimulus relations to be trained in a short space of time using an intuitive procedure that more closely parallels the format of often well-established reading repertoires.”
From A derived relations analysis of approach-avoidance conflict: Implications for the behavioral analysis of human anxiety (2011) · cites this paper as O'Hora et al., 2004
The Experimental Overview (p. 5) says the study used an REP procedure to train Before and After responding. The General Discussion (p. 19) describes testing with 24 novel stimulus sets, not rapidly training large numbers of relations. Searches for training speed, an intuitive format, and parallels with reading repertoires found no passage supporting the claimed advantages. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 106
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of The Experimental AnalysisofBehavior, 59,61-81.
- CHOMSKY, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26-58.
- BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., DYMOND, S., & O'HORA, D. (2001). Multiple stimulus relations and the transformation of stimulus functions. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. T. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
- COHEN, J. D., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25(2), 257-271.
- HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J.(1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
- HAYES, S. C., & BARNES, D.(1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations takes more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235-244.
- HAYES, S. C., ZETTLE,R. D., & ROSENFARB, I. (1989). Rule following. In S.C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 191-220). New York: Plenum.
- HEALY, O., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (2000). Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 207-227.
- LAZAR, R. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381-392.
- MACCORQUODALE, K. (1969). B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. A retrospective appreciation. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 831-841.
- O'HORA, D., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Developing a procedure to model the establishment of rule governance. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 19, 14-16.
- OKOUCHI, H. (1999). Instructions as discriminative stimuli. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72,205-214.
- ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D.(1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-300.
- STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,56, 519-555.
- WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). The transfer of conditional sequencing through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125-144.
- Authors
- O’Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P.
- Affiliations
- National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
- Leiden University (NL)
- Venue
- The Psychological Record
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437-460
- ISSN
- 0033-2933 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-3452
- OpenAlex
- W1591686281
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Psychological Record (publishedVersion)
- Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
- OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- relational frame theory, instructional control, verbal behavior, language acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
