Assessing relational learning deficits in perspective-taking in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This insight has led to new assessment and training methods for children who fail to develop perspective-taking skills.
“This insight has led to new assessment and training methods for children who fail to develop perspective-taking skills (Rehfeldt, Dillen, Zionek, & Kowalchuk, 2007).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Contextual Behavioral Science: Examining the Progress of a Distinctive Model of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as Rehfeldt, Dillen, Zionek, & Kowalchuk, 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Rehfeldt, R. A., Dillen, J. E., Ziomek, M. M., & Kowalchuk, R. K.
- Affiliations
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
- ORCID
- Rehfeldt, Ruth Anne
- Venue
- The Psychological Record
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-47
- ISSN
- 0033-2933 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-3452
- OpenAlex
- W1506556048
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Psychological Record (publishedVersion)
- OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- perspective taking, autism spectrum disorder, high-functioning autism, relational frame theory, social dysfunction, reinforcement history, children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review