Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58Color perception and designColor Science and ApplicationsCategorization, perception, and language

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Color discrimination, color naming and color preferences in 80-year olds

Wijk, H., Berg, S., Sivik, L., Steen, B.·1999·Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
DOI 10.1007/bf03399660
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate color discrimination, color naming and color preference in a random sample of 80-year-old men and women. Knowledge of color perception in old age can be of value when using color contrast, cues and codes in the environment to promote orientation and function. The color naming test indicated that the colors white, black, yellow, red, blue and green promoted recognition to the highest degree among all subjects. A gender-related difference, in favor of women, occurred in naming five of the mixed colors. Women also used more varied color names than men. Color discrimination was easier in the red and yellow area than in the blue and green area. This result correlates positively with visual function on far sight, and negatively with diagnosis of a cataract. The preference order for seven colors put blue, green and red at the top, and brown at the bottom, hence agreeing with earlier studies, and indicating that the preference order for colors remains relatively stable also in old age. This result should be considered when designing environments for old people.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03399660

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Lawton M.P., Nahemow L.: Ecology and the aging process. In: Eisdorfer C., Lawton M.P. (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging. American Psychological Association, Washington D.C., 1973, pp. 619–674. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Lawton M.P.: Competence, environmental press, and the adaption of older people. In: Lawton M.P., Winley P.G., Byerts T.O. (Eds.), Aging and the environment Theoretical approaches. Springer Publishing Company, Inc., New York, 1982, pp. 33–59.
  3. Cooper B.A., Gowland C., Mcintosh J.: The use of color in the environment of the elderly to enhance function. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2: 151–163, 1986. · DOI
  4. Grant L.A.: Environment and quality of life. A reaction from the perspective of social science and environmental design. In: National League for Nursing (Eds.), Indices of Quality in Long-term Care: Research and Practice. New York, NY. 1989, pp. 109–124.
  5. Cooper B., Mohide A., Gilbert S.: Testing the use of color in a long-term setting. Dimensions in Health Services 66: 22–26, 1989.
  6. Hayter J.: Modifying the environment to help older persons. Nursing & Health Care. May: 265–269, 1983.
  7. Kline D.W., Scialfa C.T.: Visual and auditory aging. In: Birren J.E, Schaie W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging, ed. 4. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, 1996, pp. 181–203.
  8. Era P., Rantanen T.: Changes in physical capacity and sen-sory/psychomotor functions from 75 to 80 years of age and from 80 to 85 years of age–a longitudinal study. Scand. J. Soc. Med. (Suppl. 5): 25–43, 1997.
  9. Cooper B., Ward M., Gowland C., Mcintosh J.M.: The use of the Lanthony New Color test in determining the effects of aging on color vision. J. Gerontol. 46: 320–324, 1991. · DOI
  10. Berlin B., Kay P: Basic color terms. Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1969, pp. 1–110.
  11. Nowaczyk R.: Sex-related differences in the color lexicon. Lang. Speech 25: 257–265, 1982. · DOI
  12. Thomas L.I., Curtis A.T., Bolton R.: Sex differences in elicited color lexicon size. Percept. Mot. Skills 47: 77–78, 1978. · DOI
  13. Rich E.: Sex-related differences in colour vocabulary. Lang. Speech 20: 404–409, 1977. · DOI
  14. Greene K., Gynther M.: Blue versus periwinkle. Color identification and gender. Percept. Mot. Skills 80: 27–32, 1995. · DOI
  15. Simpson J., Tarrant A.: Sex and age related differences in colour vocabulary. Lang. Speech 34: 57–62, 1991. · DOI
  16. Swaringen S., Layman S., Wilson A.: Sex differences in colour naming. Percept. Mot. Skills 47: 440–442, 1978. · DOI
  17. Eysenck H.J.: A critical and experimental study of color preference. Am. J. Psychol. 54: 385–391, 1941. · DOI
  18. Buckalew L., Buckalew N., Ross S.: Note on preference and color vision test performance. Percept. Mot. Skills 69: 1039–1042, 1989. · DOI
  19. Silver N.C., Ferrante R.: Sex differences in color preferences among an elderly sample. Percept. Mot. Skills 80: 920–922, 1995. · DOI
  20. Wijk H., Sivik L.: Some aspects of color perception among patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Scand. J. Caring Sc. 9: 3–9, 1995. · DOI
  21. Helson H., Lansford T.: The role of spectral energy of source and background pleasantness of object color. Applied Optics 9: 1513–1562, 1970. · DOI
  22. Wise B.K., Wise J.A.: The human factors of color in environmental design. A critical Review. Dept. of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, 1987, pp. 1–85.
  23. Sivik L.: Color meaning and perceptual color dimensions. A study of color samples. Göteborg Psychological Reports 4(1). University of Göteborg, Gothenburg, 1974, pp. 1–17.
  24. Hard A., Sivik L.: NCS-Natural Color System. A Swedish standard for color notation. Color Res. Appl. 6: 129–138, 1981. · DOI
  25. Sivik L.: Color Systems for Cognitive Mapping of Color Terms. In: Hardin L., Maffi L. (Eds.), Color Categories in Thought and Language. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996, pp. 163–193.
  26. Hard A., Sivik L., Tonnqvist G.: Natural Color System–From concept to research and application (I, II). Color Res. Appl. 21: 180–221, 1996. · DOI
  27. Schroll M., Steen B., Berg S., Heikkinen E., Viidik A.: NORA-Nordic research on ageing. Functional capacity of 75-year-old men and women in three Nordic localities. Dan. Med. Bull. 40: 618–624, 1993.
  28. Heikkinen E.: Theoretical background and implementation of the study. In: Heikkinen E., Berg S., Schroll M., Steen B., Viidik A. (Eds.), Functional status, health and aging. The NORA study. Facts, Research and Intervention in Geriatrics. Serdi Publisher, Paris, 1997, pp. 15–26.
  29. Sivik L., Taft C.: Colour Naming. A Mapping in the NCS of the Most Common Colour Names. Scand. J. Psychol. 35: 144–164, 1994. · DOI
  30. Linksz A.: The development of visual standards. Snellen, Jaeger, and Giraud-Teulon. Bull. NY. Acad. Med. 51: 277–285, 1975.
  31. Jaeger E.: Ueber staar und staaroperationen nebst an-deren beobachtungen und erfahrungen. Seidel, Vienna, 1854, pp. 1–128.
  32. Winters R.K.V.: Adapting the environment to age-related sensory losses. J. Am. Acad. Nurse Pract. 1: 106–111, 1989. · DOI
  33. Sivik L., Hard A.: Namn på färger. En karläggning i NCS av de vanligaste färgorden. Färgrapport nr F24. Skandinaviska Färginstitutet, Stockholm, 1984, pp. 1–24.
  34. Raven J.C.: Guide to the standard progressive matrices. H.K. Lewis, London, 1960.
  35. Wechsler D.: The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Williams & Wilkins Co, Baltimore, 1958, pp. 1–297. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Dureman I., Sälde H.: Studies in psychometric and experimental methods for the clinical evaluation of mental functioning. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1959, pp. 1–106.
  37. Wechsler D.: A standardized memory scale for clinical use. J. Psychol. 19: 87–95, 1945. · DOI
  38. Hultsch D.F., Masson M.E.J., Small B.J.: Adult age differences in direct and indirect tests of memory. J. Geront. Psychol. Sc. 46: 22–30, 1991. · DOI
  39. Perlmutter M.: A life-span view of memory. In: Baltes P.B., Featherman D.L., Lemer R.M. (Eds.), Life-span development and behaviour. Erlbaum, Hillsdale N.J., 1986, pp. 271–313.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wijk, H., Berg, S., Sivik, L., & Steen, B.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Wijk, H.
ORCID
Wijk, H.
Venue
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1999-06
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
176-185
ISSN
  • 1594-0667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1720-8319
DOI
10.1007/bf03399660
OpenAlex
W1606932660
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
  • Aging Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Color Science and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
color discrimination, color naming, color preference, older adults, gender differences, cataract, visual acuity, color contrast
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cataract, Color, Color Perception, Discrimination Learning, Female, Glaucoma, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Sex Factors, Verbal Learning, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.