Carbon dioxide sequestration by direct mineral carbonation: process mineralogy of feed and products
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of two pre-treatment methods can achieve unexpected activation effects.
“The combination of two pre-treatment methods, such thermal-chemical activation [49], chemical-mechanical activation [50], thermal-mechanical activation [51] can achieve unexpected activation effects.”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 181
- Authors
- O’Connor, W. K., Dahlin, D. C., Rush, G. E., Dahlin, C. L., & Collins, W. K.
- Affiliations
- United States Department of Energy (US)
- Venue
- Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-101
- ISSN
- 2524-3462 (ISSN-L)
- 2524-3470
- OpenAlex
- W1598083914
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mining Metallurgy & Exploration (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Keywords
- CO2 sequestration, process mineralogy, olivine, serpentine, magnesium carbonate precipitation, mineral dissolution, partial pressure of CO2, reaction pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
