The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stability and robust stability of time-delay systems: A guided tour
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Cited by
Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems
Richard, J.-P. (2003) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(03)00167-5 · Cited by 3,353
An integral inequality in the stability problem of time-delay systems
Gu, K. (2002) · Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187) · doi:10.1109/cdc.2000.914233 · Cited by 1,543
Analysis and synthesis of nonlinear time-delay systems via fuzzy control approach
Cao, Y.-Y., & Frank, P. M. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.842153 · Cited by 760
Metadata
- Authors
- Niculescu, S.-I., Verriest, E. I., Dugard, L., & Dion, J.-M.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Published
- 2005-11-19
- Pages
- 1-71
- OpenAlex
- W193977774
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.88
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
