The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Decision Diffie-Hellman problem
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Secure Conjunctive Keyword Search over Encrypted Data
Golle, P., Staddon, J., & Waters, B. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24852-1_3 · Cited by 773
Coercion-resistant electronic elections
Juels, A., Catalano, D., & Jakobsson, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society · doi:10.1145/1102199.1102213 · Cited by 414
Efficient Password-Authenticated Key Exchange Using Human-Memorable Passwords
Katz, J., Ostrovsky, R., & Yung, M. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44987-6_29 · Cited by 398
A Survey of Provably Secure Searchable Encryption
Bösch, C., Hartel, P., Jonker, W., & Peter, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2636328 · Cited by 357
Squealing Euros: Privacy Protection in RFID-Enabled Banknotes
Juels, A., & Pappu, R. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45126-6_8 · Cited by 347
A Systematic Review of Homomorphic Encryption and Its Contributions in Healthcare Industry
Munjal, K., & Bhatia, R. (2023) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-022-00756-z · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Boneh, D.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1998
- Pages
- 48-63
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1532961226
- Cited by
- 895
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.