The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Who Is At Risk for Developing Chronic Anal Fistula or Recurrent Anal Sepsis After Initial Perianal Abscess?
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine factors that contribute to chronic anal fistula or recurrent sepsis after initial perianal abscess. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with a first-time perianal abscess who were treated at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles between 1995 and 2007. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model to determine predictors of risk for recurrent disease. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-eight patients met inclusion criteria (105 men, 43 women; mean age, 43.6 years). During a mean follow-up of 38 months, the cumulative incidence of chronic anal fistula or recurrent sepsis was 36.5 percent. Univariate and multivariable analyses showed more than two-fold increased risk of recurrence in patients <40 years vs. those >/=40 years (P < 0.01), and univariate analysis showed nondiabetics were 2.69 times as likely to experience recurrence as diabetics (P = 0.04). No significant differences in risk of recurrence were noted for men vs. women (HR = 0.78; P = 0.39), nonsmokers vs. smokers (HR = 1.17; P = 0.58); perioperative antibiotics vs. no antibiotics (HR = 1.51; P = 0.19); or HIV-positive vs. HIV- negative status (HR = 0.72; P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Age younger than 40 years significantly increased risk of chronic anal fistula or recurrent anal sepsis after a first-time episode of perianal abscess. Patients with diabetes may have a decreased risk compared with nondiabetic patients. Gender, smoking history, perioperative antibiotic treatment, and HIV status were not risk factors for chronic anal fistula or recurrent anal sepsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsic contractility of prenodal lymph vessels and lymph flow in human leg
Olszewski, W. L., & Engeset, A. (1980) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.1980.239.6.h775 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Lymphatic vasculature development
Oliver, G. (2004) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1258 · Cited by 461
Estimating the Population Burden of Lymphedema
Rockson, S. G., & Rivera, K. K. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1413.014 · Cited by 450
Lymphatic pumping: mechanics, mechanisms and malfunction
Scallan, J. P., Zawieja, S. D., Castorena‐Gonzalez, J. A., & Davis, M. J. (2016) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp272088 · Cited by 424
Randomized Controlled Trial of Weight Training and Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Survivors
Ahmed, R. L., Thomas, W., Yee, D., & Schmitz, K. H. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.6749 · Cited by 332
Lymphedema and Obesity: Is There a Link?
Mehrara, B. J., & Greene, A. K. (2014) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000000268 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamadani, A., Haigh, P. I., Liu, I.-L. A., & Abbas, M. A.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-221
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1867324099
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who Is At Risk for Developing Chronic Anal Fistula or Recurrent Anal Sepsis After Initial Perianal Abscess? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/dcr.0b013e31819a5c52
- The paper
- Hamadani, A., Haigh, P. I., Liu, I.-L. A., & Abbas, M. A. (2009). Who Is At Risk for Developing Chronic Anal Fistula or Recurrent Anal Sepsis After Initial Perianal Abscess? Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/dcr.0b013e31819a5c52
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.