The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energy flow networks: deep sets for particle jets
Open accessAbstract
A key question for machine learning approaches in particle physics is how to best represent and learn from collider events. As an event is intrinsically a variable-length unordered set of particles, we build upon recent machine learning efforts to learn directly from sets of features or “point clouds”. Adapting and specializing the “Deep Sets” framework to particle physics, we introduce Energy Flow Networks, which respect infrared and collinear safety by construction. We also develop Particle Flow Networks, which allow for general energy dependence and the inclusion of additional particle-level information such as charge and flavor. These networks feature a per-particle internal (latent) representation, and summing over all particles yields an overall event-level latent representation. We show how this latent space decomposition unifies existing event representations based on detector images and radiation moments. To demonstrate the power and simplicity of this set-based approach, we apply these networks to the collider task of discriminating quark jets from gluon jets, finding similar or improved performance compared to existing methods. We also show how the learned event representation can be directly visualized, providing insight into the inner workings of the model. These architectures lend themselves to efficiently processing and analyzing events for a wide variety of tasks at the Large Hadron Collider. Implementations and examples of our architectures are available online in our EnergyFlow package.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Deep learning and its application to LHC physics
Guest, D., Cranmer, K., & Whiteson, D. (2018) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021019 · Cited by 417
DeepSetNet: Predicting Sets with Deep Neural Networks
Rezatofighi, S. H., B. G., V. K., Milan, A., Abbasnejad, E., Dick, A., & Reid, I. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.561 · Cited by 45
Cited by
Jet tagging via particle clouds
Qu, H., & Gouskos, L. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.056019 · Cited by 425
Larkoski, A. J., Moult, I., & Nachman, B. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.11.001 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Komiske, P. T., Metodiev, E. M., & Thaler, J.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 2019
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2895846750
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy flow networks: deep sets for particle jets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/jhep01(2019)121
- The paper
- Komiske, P. T., Metodiev, E. M., & Thaler, J. (2019). Energy flow networks: deep sets for particle jets. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep01(2019)121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.