The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 9 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Gravitons in a Casimir box
Open accessAbstract
A bstract: The partition function of gravitons with Casimir-type boundary conditions is worked out. The simplest box that allows one to achieve full analytical control consists of a slab geometry with two infinite parallel planes separated by a distance d . In this setting, linearized gravity, like electromagnetism, is equivalent to two free massless scalar fields, one with Dirichlet and one with Neumann boundary conditions, which in turn may be combined into a single massless scalar with periodic boundary conditions on an interval of length 2 d . When turning on a chemical potential for suitably adapted spin angular momentum, the partition function is modular covariant and expressed in terms of an Eisenstein series. It coincides with that for photons. At high temperature, the result provides in closed form all sub-leading finite-size corrections to the standard (gravitational) black body result. More interesting is the low-temperature/small distance expansion where the leading contribution to the partition function is linear in inverse temperature and given in terms of the Casimir energy of the system, whereas the leading contribution to the entropy is proportional to the area and originates from gravitons propagating parallel to the plates.
Overview
CoChat Summary
TL;DR
The paper computes the partition function of gravitons with Casimir-type boundary conditions in a slab geometry and shows it coincides with that of photons. It derives modular-covariant exact results, with high-temperature black-body corrections and a low-temperature entropy proportional to the plate area.
Key findings
- In a slab with two infinite parallel planes separated by distance \(d\), linearized gravity with Casimir-type boundary conditions is equivalent to two free massless scalar fields (one Dirichlet, one Neumann), or to a single massless scalar with periodic boundary conditions on an interval of length \(2d\); the graviton partition function coincides with the photon one.
- With a chemical potential for suitably adapted spin angular momentum, the partition function is modular covariant and expressed through the real analytic Eisenstein series: \(\ln Z(\tau,\bar\tau)=\frac{1}{2\pi^2}\frac{L_1L_2}{L_3^2}\frac{f_2(\tau,\bar\tau)}{\operatorname{Im}\tau}\), with \(\tau=\alpha+i\beta/L_3\), \(L_3=2d\).
- At high temperature, the result gives all sub-leading finite-size corrections to the black-body result; for \(\alpha=0\), \(S(\beta,0)=\frac{8\xi(4)L_1L_2 d}{\beta^3}+\cdots\), where \(\xi(4)=\pi^2/90\).
- At low temperature/small distance, the leading partition-function contribution is linear in inverse temperature and given by the Casimir energy \(E_0(0)=-\xi(4)L_1L_2/L_3^3\); the leading entropy is \(S(\beta,\alpha)=\frac{3\xi(3)L_1L_2}{\beta^2}+\cdots\), proportional to the area and originating from gravitons propagating parallel to the plates.
Methods
- Hamiltonian/Pauli-Fierz analysis of free massless spin-2 fields in a slab geometry, imposing Casimir-type boundary conditions: \(h_{ab}=0=\pi_{ab}\), \(h_{33}=0=\pi_{33}\), and \(\partial_3 h_{a3}=0=\partial_3\pi_{a3}\) at the plates.
- Mode expansions and reduced phase-space decomposition isolate the particle sector, modes propagating parallel to the plates (\(n_3=0\)), and modes with normal propagation (\(n_3>0\)); these are reorganized into Dirichlet/Neumann scalar fields and then a single periodic scalar on length \(2d\).
- Partition function computed via functional methods (Eisenstein series), canonical quantum-statistical expansion (modified Bessel functions), and method of images, with modular parameter \(\tau=\alpha+i\beta/L_3\).
Limitations
- The paper states it does not address whether gravitons can be confined to a box to achieve thermal equilibrium, does not speculate on the physical meaning of perfect conductors for gravitons, and does not discuss full nonlinear general relativity, black-hole physics, or cosmological models.
- Stated open questions include ADM surface charges for this setup, extension to more general boundary geometries and curved backgrounds, and the need for interactions/Newton’s constant to distinguish linearized gravity from electromagnetism.
- Evident from the text: the analysis is restricted to free linearized gravity in an idealized slab geometry, with no interactions included.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 4 Not checked · 48 Own results and interpretations
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for large |z|, all other terms are exponentially suppressed.”
§ Gravitons in a Casimir box > JHEP02(2021)216
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the second of these transformations, we get ln Z(β , α ) = α 2 + β 2 L 2 3 ln Z(β, α).”
§ Gravitons in a Casimir box > JHEP02(2021)216
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More generally, the leading contributions are given by the first two terms, while the others are exponentially suppressed.”
§ Gravitons in a Casimir box > JHEP02(2021)216
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For α = 0, this gives the standard black body result (B.17) when taking into account that the volume of the system is V = L 1 L 2 d.”
§ Gravitons in a Casimir box > JHEP02(2021)216
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the expression of the partition function in terms of the real analytic Eisenstein (5.5), this term comes from the modes with vanishing Matsubara frequencies n 4 = 0.”
§ Gravitons in a Casimir box > JHEP02(2021)216
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
28 more claims
Create a free account to see all 52 claims and to verify the 8 references still open.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 9
- It may state two separate claims as one. 12
Citations
Cites
(2020) · Electromagnetic Processes · doi:10.2307/j.ctv131bv37.5 · Cited by 21,966
Marc Henneaux, A., & Teitelboim, C. (1992) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691213866 · Cited by 2,326
Henneaux, M., & Teitelboim, C. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv10crg0r · Cited by 2,082
Quantum field theory in curved spacetime
DeWitt, B. S. (1975) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(75)90051-4 · Cited by 1,730
Advances in the Casimir Effect
Bordag, M., Klimchitskaya, G. L., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. M. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238743.001.0001 · Cited by 1,284
Plunien, G. (1986) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(86)90020-7 · Cited by 797
Boyer, T. H. (1968) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.174.1764 · Cited by 587
Phillips, M. (1962) · Handbuch der Physik · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45973-3_1 · Cited by 566
Dalvit, D. A. R., Milonni, P. W., Roberts, D. C., & Rosa, F. S. S. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20288-9_1 · Cited by 565
Electromagnetic waves near perfect conductors. II. Casimir effect
Balian, R., & Duplantier, B. (1978) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(78)90083-0 · Cited by 449
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- H. B. Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates, Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. 51 (1948) 793.
Cited by
Kraus, P., Monten, R., & Myers, R. M. (2021) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.11.3.070 · Cited by 45
Anninos, D., Galante, D. A., & Maneerat, C. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)024 · Cited by 44
Notes on massless scalar field partition functions, modular invariance and Eisenstein series
Alessio, F., Glenn Barnich, A., & Bonte, M. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2021)211 · Cited by 10
Self-citationVacuum Energy, the Casimir Effect, and Newton’s Non-Constant
Koch, B., Käding, C., Pitschmann, M., & Sedmik, R. I. P. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9110476 · Cited by 8
A black hole toy model with non-local and boundary modes from non-trivial boundary conditions
Cheng, P. (2023) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11757-8 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Alessio, F., Barnich, G., & Bronte, M.
- Affiliations
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 2021
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3109090483
- Semantic Scholar
- 0414da306cefd338315f69da14b66b4c5d2e9c8b
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2021-03-24)
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (vor, 24 d)
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (FRFC PDRT.1025.14, IISN 4.4503.15, IISN 4.4503, T.1025.14, PDR T.1025.14, 4.4503, 4.4503.15)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- graviton, Casimir effect, partition function, linearized gravity, slab geometry, periodic boundary conditions, modular covariance, Eisenstein series, blackbody radiation, finite-size corrections, Casimir energy, gravitational entropy, parallel plates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitons in a Casimir box. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/jhep02(2021)216
- The paper
- Alessio, F., Barnich, G., & Bronte, M. (2021). Gravitons in a Casimir box. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2021)216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.