CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vacuum stability bounds on Higgs coupling deviations in the absence of new bosons

Blum, Kfir, D’Agnolo, Raffaele Tito, Fan, JiJi·2015·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep03(2015)166
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep03(2015)166

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the standard model of particle physics, the present vacuum state of the universe may not be stable but only metastable, with another lower energy state at high expectation values of the Higgs field.

    “Nevertheless, the recent discovery of the Higgs boson [1,2] raises the possibility that, even within the standard model of particle physics, the present vacuum state of the universe may not be stable, but only metastable, with another lower energy state at high expectation values of the Higgs field [3][4][5][6][7].”

    From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction discusses Standard Model vacuum stability and says the measured Higgs and top masses are consistent with stability up to very high scales. The paper’s instability analysis concerns models with new fermions beyond the Standard Model; the passages found do not establish the claimed possibility of a lower-energy state at high Higgs-field values within the Standard Model itself. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 110

  1. CMS collaboration, Evidence for the direct decay of the 125 GeV Higgs boson to fermions, Nature Phys. 10 (2014) 557 [ arXiv:1401.6527 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  2. CMS collaboration, Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3076 [ arXiv:1407.0558 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  3. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the b b ¯ $$ b\overline{b} $$ decay of the Standard Model Higgs boson in associated (W/Z)H production with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 01 (2015) 069 [ arXiv:1409.6212 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  4. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 112015 [ arXiv:1408.7084 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  5. ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of Higgs boson production and couplings in the four-lepton channel in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 012006 [ arXiv:1408.5191 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  6. S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Softly Broken Supersymmetry and SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981) 150 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  7. D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 183 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  8. D.B. Kaplan, H. Georgi and S. Dimopoulos, Composite Higgs scalars, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 187 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  9. B. Zhang and H.-q. Zheng, Top quark, heavy fermions and the composite Higgs boson, Commun. Theor. Phys. 35 (2001) 162 [ hep-ph/0003065 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  10. M. Sher, Electroweak Higgs Potentials and Vacuum Stability, Phys. Rept. 179 (1989) 273 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  11. A. Datta, B.L. Young and X. Zhang, Implications of a nonstandard light Higgs boson, Phys. Lett. B 385 (1996) 225 [ hep-ph/9604312 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  12. G. Altarelli and G. Isidori, Lower limit on the Higgs mass in the standard model: An Update, Phys. Lett. B 337 (1994) 141 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  13. J.A. Casas, J.R. Espinosa and M. Quirós, Improved Higgs mass stability bound in the standard model and implications for supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 342 (1995) 171 [ hep-ph/9409458 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  14. J.A. Casas, J.R. Espinosa, M. Quirós and A. Riotto, The Lightest Higgs boson mass in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 436 (1995) 3 [Erratum ibid. B 439 (1995) 466-468] [ hep-ph/9407389 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  15. J.R. Espinosa and M. Quirós, Improved metastability bounds on the standard model Higgs mass, Phys. Lett. B 353 (1995) 257 [ hep-ph/9504241 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  16. P.Q. Hung and M. Sher, Implications of a Higgs discovery at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 374 (1996) 138 [ hep-ph/9512313 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  17. J.A. Casas, J.R. Espinosa and M. Quirós, Standard model stability bounds for new physics within LHC reach, Phys. Lett. B 382 (1996) 374 [ hep-ph/9603227 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  18. A. Andreassen, W. Frost and M.D. Schwartz, Consistent Use of the Standard Model Effective Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 241801 [ arXiv:1408.0292 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  19. V. Branchina, E. Messina and M. Sher, Lifetime of the electroweak vacuum and sensitivity to Planck scale physics, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 013003 [ arXiv:1408.5302 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  20. M.E. Peskin, Comparison of LHC and ILC Capabilities for Higgs Boson Coupling Measurements, arXiv:1207.2516 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  21. N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2005) 073 [ hep-th/0405159 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  22. G.F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Split supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 699 (2004) 65 [Erratum ibid. B 706 (2005) 65] [ hep-ph/0406088 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  23. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G.F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Aspects of split supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 709 (2005) 3 [ hep-ph/0409232 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  24. J.D. Wells, PeV-scale supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 015013 [ hep-ph/0411041 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  25. D.M. Asner et al., ILC Higgs White Paper, arXiv:1310.0763 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  26. TLEP Design Study Working Group collaboration, M. Bicer et al., First Look at the Physics Case of TLEP, JHEP 01 (2014) 164 [ arXiv:1308.6176 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  27. S. Dawson et al., Working Group Report: Higgs Boson, arXiv:1310.8361 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  28. J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Possible Futures of Electroweak Precision: ILC, FCC-ee and CEPC, arXiv:1411.1054 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  29. A. Joglekar, P. Schwaller and C.E.M. Wagner, Dark Matter and Enhanced Higgs to Di-photon Rate from Vector-like Leptons, JHEP 12 (2012) 064 [ arXiv:1207.4235 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  30. J. Kearney, A. Pierce and N. Weiner, Vectorlike Fermions and Higgs Couplings, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 113005 [ arXiv:1207.7062 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  31. B. Batell, S. Gori and L.-T. Wang, Higgs Couplings and Precision Electroweak Data, JHEP 01 (2013) 139 [ arXiv:1209.6382 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  32. W. Altmannshofer, M. Bauer and M. Carena, Exotic Leptons: Higgs, Flavor and Collider Phenomenology, JHEP 01 (2014) 060 [ arXiv:1308.1987 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  33. S.A.R. Ellis, R.M. Godbole, S. Gopalakrishna and J.D. Wells, Survey of vector-like fermion extensions of the Standard Model and their phenomenological implications, JHEP 09 (2014) 130 [ arXiv:1404.4398 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  34. M. Fairbairn and P. Grothaus, Baryogenesis and Dark Matter with Vector-like Fermions, JHEP 10 (2013) 176 [ arXiv:1307.8011 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  35. D. Chowdhury, R.M. Godbole, K.A. Mohan and S.K. Vempati, Charge and Color Breaking Constraints in MSSM after the Higgs Discovery at LHC, JHEP 02 (2014) 110 [ arXiv:1310.1932 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  36. Z. Lalak, M. Lewicki and P. Olszewski, Higher-order scalar interactions and SM vacuum stability, JHEP 05 (2014) 119 [ arXiv:1402.3826 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  37. P.S. Bhupal Dev, D.K. Ghosh, N. Okada and I. Saha, 125 GeV Higgs Boson and the Type-II Seesaw Model, JHEP 03 (2013) 150 [Erratum ibid. 1305 (2013) 049] [ arXiv:1301.3453 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  38. N. Maru and N. Okada, Diphoton decay excess and 125 GeV Higgs boson in gauge-Higgs unification, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 095019 [ arXiv:1303.5810 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  39. W.-Z. Feng and P. Nath, Higgs diphoton rate and mass enhancement with vectorlike leptons and the scale of supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 075018 [ arXiv:1303.0289 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  40. R. Huo, G. Lee, A.M. Thalapillil and C.E.M. Wagner, SU(2)SU(2) gauge extensions of the MSSM revisited, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 055011 [ arXiv:1212.0560 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  41. M. Carena, S. Gori, I. Low, N.R. Shah and C.E.M. Wagner, Vacuum Stability and Higgs Diphoton Decays in the MSSM, JHEP 02 (2013) 114 [ arXiv:1211.6136 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  42. H. Davoudiasl, I. Lewis and E. Ponton, Electroweak Phase Transition, Higgs Diphoton Rate and New Heavy Fermions, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 093001 [ arXiv:1211.3449 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  43. B. Batell, S. Jung and H.M. Lee, Singlet Assisted Vacuum Stability and the Higgs to Diphoton Rate, JHEP 01 (2013) 135 [ arXiv:1211.2449 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  44. H.M. Lee, M. Park and W.-I. Park, Axion-mediated dark matter and Higgs diphoton signal, JHEP 12 (2012) 037 [ arXiv:1209.1955 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  45. E.J. Chun, H.M. Lee and P. Sharma, Vacuum Stability, Perturbativity, EWPD and Higgs-to-diphoton rate in Type II Seesaw Models, JHEP 11 (2012) 106 [ arXiv:1209.1303 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  46. A. Kobakhidze, Standard Model with a distorted Higgs sector and the enhanced Higgs diphoton decay rate, arXiv:1208.5180 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  47. T. Kitahara, Vacuum Stability Constraints on the Enhancement of the h → γγ rate in the MSSM, JHEP 11 (2012) 021 [ arXiv:1208.4792 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  48. G.F. Giudice, P. Paradisi, A. Strumia and A. Strumia, Correlation between the Higgs Decay Rate to Two Photons and the Muon g-2, JHEP 10 (2012) 186 [ arXiv:1207.6393 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  49. N. Arkani-Hamed, K. Blum, R.T. D’Agnolo and J. Fan, 2:1 for Naturalness at the LHC?, JHEP 01 (2013) 149 [ arXiv:1207.4482 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  50. M. Reece, Vacuum Instabilities with a Wrong-Sign Higgs-Gluon-Gluon Amplitude, New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 043003 [ arXiv:1208.1765 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  51. D. Choudhury, T.M.P. Tait and C.E.M. Wagner, Beautiful mirrors and precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 053002 [ hep-ph/0109097 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  52. D.E. Morrissey and C.E.M. Wagner, Beautiful mirrors, unification of couplings and collider phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 053001 [ hep-ph/0308001 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  53. S. Dawson and E. Furlan, A Higgs Conundrum with Vector Fermions, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015021 [ arXiv:1205.4733 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  54. S.R. Coleman, The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929 [Erratum ibid. D 16 (1977) 1248] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  55. G. Isidori, G. Ridolfi and A. Strumia, On the metastability of the standard model vacuum, Nucl. Phys. B 609 (2001) 387 [ hep-ph/0104016 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  56. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak Precision Observables, New Physics and the Nature of a 126 GeV Higgs Boson, JHEP 08 (2013) 106 [ arXiv:1306.4644 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  57. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Olive et al., Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 38 (2014) 090001. · DOI
  58. H. Baer et al., The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 2: Physics, arXiv:1306.6352 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  59. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through D = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP 11 (2013) 066 [ arXiv:1308.1879 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  60. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [ arXiv:1308.2627 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  61. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [ arXiv:1310.4838 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  62. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [ arXiv:1312.2014 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  63. Gfitter Group collaboration, M. Baak et al., The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3046 [ arXiv:1407.3792 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  64. J. Brod, A. Greljo, E. Stamou and P. Uttayarat, Probing anomalous t t ¯ Z $$ t\overline{t}Z $$ interactions with rare meson decays, JHEP 02 (2015) 141 [ arXiv:1408.0792 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  65. J.R. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard and D.V. Nanopoulos, A Phenomenological Profile of the Higgs Boson, Nucl. Phys. B 106 (1976) 292 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  66. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, M.B. Voloshin and V.I. Zakharov, Low-Energy Theorems for Higgs Boson Couplings to Photons, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30 (1979) 711 [ INSPIRE ].
  67. A. Djouadi, The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model, Phys. Rept. 457 (2008) 1 [ hep-ph/0503172 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  68. C. Grojean, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Scaling of Higgs Operators and h → γγ, JHEP 04 (2013) 016 [ arXiv:1301.2588 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  69. M.-L. Xiao and J.-H. Yu, Stabilizing electroweak vacuum in a vectorlike fermion model, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 014007 [ arXiv:1404.0681 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  70. T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Infrared Singularities and Massive Fields, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2856 [ INSPIRE ].
  71. F. Staub, SARAH, arXiv:0806.0538 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  72. F. Staub, Automatic Calculation of supersymmetric Renormalization Group Equations and Self Energies, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 808 [ arXiv:1002.0840 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  73. F. Staub, SARAH 4: A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1773 [ arXiv:1309.7223 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  74. F. Staub, SARAH 3.2: Dirac Gauginos, UFO output and more, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) pp. 1792-1809 [ arXiv:1207.0906 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  75. F. Lyonnet, I. Schienbein, F. Staub and A. Wingerter, PyR@TE: Renormalization Group Equations for General Gauge Theories, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1130 [ arXiv:1309.7030 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  76. F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable contributions of new exotic quarks to quark mixing, JHEP 09 (2000) 011 [ hep-ph/0007316 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  77. F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Effective description of quark mixing, Phys. Lett. B 492 (2000) 98 [ hep-ph/0007160 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  78. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  79. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [ arXiv:1008.4884 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  80. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, What is the limit on the Higgs mass?, Phys. Lett. B 462 (1999) 144 [ hep-ph/9905281 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  81. A. Falkowski, D.M. Straub and A. Vicente, Vector-like leptons: Higgs decays and collider phenomenology, JHEP 05 (2014) 092 [ arXiv:1312.5329 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  82. R. Dermíšek, J.P. Hall, E. Lunghi and S. Shin, Limits on Vectorlike Leptons from Searches for Anomalous Production of Multi-Lepton Events, JHEP 12 (2014) 013 [ arXiv:1408.3123 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  83. CMS collaboration, Inclusive search for a vector-like T quark with charge 2 3 $$ \frac{2}{3} $$ in pp collisions at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 729 (2014) 149 [ arXiv:1311.7667 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  84. M. Aliev et al., HATHOR: HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 1034 [ arXiv:1007.1327 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  85. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, Squark and gluino production at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997) 51 [ hep-ph/9610490 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  86. A. Kulesza and L. Motyka, Threshold resummation for squark-antisquark and gluino-pair production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 111802 [ arXiv:0807.2405 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  87. A. Kulesza and L. Motyka, Soft gluon resummation for the production of gluino-gluino and squark-antisquark pairs at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095004 [ arXiv:0905.4749 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  88. W. Beenakker et al., Soft-gluon resummation for squark and gluino hadroproduction, JHEP 12 (2009) 041 [ arXiv:0909.4418 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  89. W. Beenakker et al., Squark and Gluino Hadroproduction, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 2637 [ arXiv:1105.1110 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  90. V. Ilisie and A. Pich, QCD exotics versus a Standard Model Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 033001 [ arXiv:1202.3420 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  91. CMS collaboration, Searches for long-lived charged particles in pp collisions at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 7 and 8 TeV, JHEP 07 (2013) 122 [ arXiv:1305.0491 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  92. R. Mackeprang and D. Milstead, An Updated Description of Heavy-Hadron Interactions in GEANT-4, Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010) 493 [ arXiv:0908.1868 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  93. A.C. Kraan, Interactions of heavy stable hadronizing particles, Eur. Phys. J. C 37 (2004) 91 [ hep-ex/0404001 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  94. R. Mackeprang and A. Rizzi, Interactions of Coloured Heavy Stable Particles in Matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 50 (2007) 353 [ hep-ph/0612161 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  95. R.T. D’Agnolo and D.M. Straub, Gauged flavour symmetry for the light generations, JHEP 05 (2012) 034 [ arXiv:1202.4759 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  96. ATLAS collaboration, Search for pair-produced heavy quarks decaying to Wq in the two-lepton channel at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 012007 [ arXiv:1202.3389 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  97. CMS collaboration, Search for anomalous production of events with three or more leptons in pp collisions at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 032006 [ arXiv:1404.5801 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  98. CMS collaboration, Search for pair-produced resonances decaying to jet pairs in proton-proton collisions at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV, arXiv:1412.7706 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  99. CMS collaboration, Searches for light- and heavy-flavour three-jet resonances in pp collisions at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014) 193 [ arXiv:1311.1799 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  100. ATLAS collaboration, Search for pair and single production of new heavy quarks that decay to a Z boson and a third-generation quark in pp collisions at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2014) 104 [ arXiv:1409.5500 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  101. CMS collaboration, Search for top-quark partners with charge 5/3 in the same-sign dilepton final state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 171801 [ arXiv:1312.2391 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  102. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker and M. Spira, PROSPINO: A Program for the production of supersymmetric particles in next-to-leading order QCD, hep-ph/9611232 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  103. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [ hep-ph/0603175 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  104. J. Pumplin et al., New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis, JHEP 07 (2002) 012 [ hep-ph/0201195 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  105. C. Degrande et al., UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201 [ arXiv:1108.2040 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  106. A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [ arXiv:1310.1921 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  107. N.D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules — Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1614 [ arXiv:0806.4194 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  108. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [ arXiv:1106.0522 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  109. CMS collaboration, Performance of τ-lepton reconstruction and identification in CMS, 2012 JINST 7 P01001 [ arXiv:1109.6034 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  110. ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct production of charginos, neutralinos and sleptons in final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 05 (2014) 071 [ arXiv:1403.5294 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Blum, K., D’Agnolo, R. T., & Fan, J.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-03
Volume
2015
Issue
3
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep03(2015)166
Cited by
35
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review