CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Dynamics of black holes in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity

Open access
Suh, S. Josephine·2020·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep03(2020)093
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We present a general solution for correlators of external boundary operators in black hole states of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity. We use the Hilbert space constructed using the particle-with-spin interpretation of the Jackiw-Teitelboim action, which consists of wavefunctions defined on Lorentzian AdS 2. The density of states of the gravitational system appears in the amplitude for a boundary particle to emit and reabsorb matter. Up to self-interactions of matter, a general correlator can be reduced in an energy basis to a product of amplitudes for interactions and Wilson polynomials mapping between boundary and bulk interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep03(2020)093

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The GHY boundary term of the gravity path integral can be rewritten using the 2d Gauss-Bonnet theorem into a worldline path integral, which is a non-relativistic particle in 2d hyperbolic space in an imaginary infinite magnetic field.

    “A different approach uses a direct rewriting of the GHY boundary term of the gravity path integral using the 2d Gauss–Bonnet theorem into a worldline path integral as (Kitaev and Suh 2019; Yang 2019; Suh 2020):3.83which is a non-relativistic particle in 2d hyperbolic space (T, Z) in an imaginary infinite magnetic field.”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Suh 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suh, S. J.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Suh, S. Josephine
ORCID
Suh, S. Josephine
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-03
Volume
2020
Issue
3
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/jhep03(2020)093
OpenAlex
W2989999157
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (NSF PHY 17-48958, 1748958)
  • Simons Foundation (PHY-1748958, NSF PHY-1748958)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, black holes, boundary correlators, density of states, black hole states, Wilson polynomials, two-dimensional gravity, holography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review