CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A membrane paradigm at large D

Bhattacharyya, Sayantani, De, Anandita, Minwalla, Shiraz, Mohan, Ravi, Saha, Arunabha·2016·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep04(2016)076
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep04(2016)076

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. E. Witten, Quarks, atoms, and the 1/N expansion, Phys. Today 33 (1980) 38. · DOI
  3. R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe, The large D limit of General Relativity, JHEP 06 (2013) 009 [ arXiv:1302.6382 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. R. Emparan, D. Grumiller and K. Tanabe, Large-D gravity and low-D strings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251102 [ arXiv:1303.1995 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  5. R. Emparan and K. Tanabe, Holographic superconductivity in the large D expansion, JHEP 01 (2014) 145 [ arXiv:1312.1108 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  6. R. Emparan and K. Tanabe, Universal quasinormal modes of large D black holes, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 064028 [ arXiv:1401.1957 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  7. R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe, Instability of rotating black holes: large D analysis, JHEP 06 (2014) 106 [ arXiv:1402.6215 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  8. R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe, Decoupling and non-decoupling dynamics of large D black holes, JHEP 07 (2014) 113 [ arXiv:1406.1258 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  9. R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe, Quasinormal modes of (Anti-)de Sitter black holes in the 1/D expansion, JHEP 04 (2015) 085 [ arXiv:1502.02820 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  10. R. Emparan, Black Holes in 1/D expansion, talk given at Eurostrings 2015, Cambridge, U.K., 23-27 March 2015. · DOI
  11. S. Bhattacharyya, V.E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani, Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP 02 (2008) 045 [ arXiv:0712.2456 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  12. M. Rangamani, Gravity and Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224003 [ arXiv:0905.4352 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  13. V.E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani, The fluid/gravity correspondence, arXiv:1107.5780 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  14. J. Armas, (Non)-Dissipative Hydrodynamics on Embedded Surfaces, JHEP 09 (2014) 047 [ arXiv:1312.0597 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  15. R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos and N.A. Obers, Blackfolds in Supergravity and String Theory, JHEP 08 (2011) 154 [ arXiv:1106.4428 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  16. J. Camps and R. Emparan, Derivation of the blackfold effective theory, JHEP 03 (2012) 038 [Erratum ibid. 1206 (2012) 155] [ arXiv:1201.3506 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  17. J. Armas, How Fluids Bend: the Elastic Expansion for Higher-Dimensional Black Holes, JHEP 09 (2013) 073 [ arXiv:1304.7773 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  18. R. Emparan, T. Shiromizu, R. Suzuki, K. Tanabe and T. Tanaka, Effective theory of Black Holes in the 1/D expansion, JHEP 06 (2015) 159 [ arXiv:1504.06489 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  19. T. Damour, Black Hole Eddy Currents, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 3598 [ INSPIRE ].
  20. R.H. Price and K.S. Thorne, The membrane paradigm for black holes, Sci. Am. 258 (1988) 69. · DOI
  21. I. Bredberg, C. Keeler, V. Lysov and A. Strominger, Wilsonian Approach to Fluid/Gravity Duality, JHEP 03 (2011) 141 [ arXiv:1006.1902 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  22. S. Bhattacharyya et al., Local Fluid Dynamical Entropy from Gravity, JHEP 06 (2008) 055 [ arXiv:0803.2526 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  23. R.C. Myers and M.J. Perry, Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times, Annals Phys. 172 (1986) 304 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. R.C. Myers, Myers-Perry black holes, arXiv:1111.1903 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bhattacharyya, S., De, A., Minwalla, S., Mohan, R., & Saha, A.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-04
Volume
2016
Issue
4
Pages
1-38
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep04(2016)076
Cited by
24
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review