Moving the CFT into the bulk with $$ T\overline{T} $$
Open accessAbstract
A bstract: Recent work by Zamolodchikov and others has uncovered a solvable irrelevant deformation of general 2D CFTs, defined by turning on the dimension 4 operator $$ T\overline{T} $$ T T ¯ ,the product of the left- and right-moving stress tensor. We propose that in the holographic dual, this deformation represents a geometric cutoff that removes the asymptotic region of AdS and places the QFT on a Dirichlet wall at finite radial distance r = r c in the bulk. As a quantitative check of the proposed duality, we compute the signal propagation speed, energy spectrum, and thermodynamic relations on both sides. In all cases, we obtain a precise match. We derive an exact RG flow equation for the metric dependence of the effective action of the $$ T\overline{T} $$ T T ¯ deformed theory, and find that it coincides with the Hamilton-Jacobi equation that governs the radial evolution of the classical gravity action in AdS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The theory in Iliesiu et al. (2020) has a non-unitary spectrum.
“A problem with this theory is that it has a non-unitary spectrum, an issue anticipated in McGough et al. (2018).”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as McGough et al. (2018)
It was proposed in McGough et al. (2018) that the AdS dual interpretation of the T Tbar deformation is to move the holographic boundary inside the bulk with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
“It was proposed in McGough et al. (2018) that the AdS dual interpretation is to move the holographic boundary inside the bulk with Dirichlet boundary conditions.”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as McGough et al. (2018)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 472
- Authors
- McGough, L., Mezei, M., & Verlinde, H.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mezei, Márk
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 2018
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2795895900
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 29.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1620059)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0016244)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
- Keywords
- T-bar T deformation, two-dimensional conformal field theory, holography, AdS/CFT correspondence, Dirichlet boundary conditions, signal propagation speed, energy spectrum, thermodynamics, renormalization group flow, Hamilton-Jacobi equation, effective action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review