Cited by 203Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

The quantum gravity dynamics of near extremal black holes

Open access
Yang, Zhenbin·2019·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

A bstract: We study the quantum effects of Near-Extremal black holes near their horizons. The gravitational dynamics in such backgrounds are closely connected to a particle in AdS 2 with constant electric field. We use this picture to solve the theory exactly. We will give a formula to calculate all correlation functions with quantum gravity backreactions as well as the exact Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunction. Using the WdW wavefunction, we investigate the complexity growth in quantum gravity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep05(2019)205

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An explicit illustration of this fact is given in Appendix C of Yang (2019) for a massless scalar field.

    “An explicit illustration of this fact is given in Appendix C of Yang (2019), for the case of a massless scalar field with (actually the calculation applies to any two-dimensional conformal field theory).22”
  • Using the known propagator of the particle in the magnetic field in the same limit, one can derive a suggestive expression for JT boundary correlators for ordered operators.

    “Using the known propagator of the particle in the magnetic field in the same limit, one can derive the following suggestive expression for JT boundary correlators for the simplest case of ordered operators (Yang 2019):3.85where the ingredients are the bulk propagators of the particle in magnetic field model in proper time (between points in the hyperbolic disk and ) and the “undressed” bulk matter”
  • The GHY boundary term of the gravity path integral can be rewritten using the 2d Gauss-Bonnet theorem into a worldline path integral, which is a non-relativistic particle in 2d hyperbolic space in an imaginary infinite magnetic field.

    “A different approach uses a direct rewriting of the GHY boundary term of the gravity path integral using the 2d Gauss–Bonnet theorem into a worldline path integral as (Kitaev and Suh 2019; Yang 2019; Suh 2020):3.83which is a non-relativistic particle in 2d hyperbolic space (T, Z) in an imaginary infinite magnetic field.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Z.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Yang, Zhenbin
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2019-05
Volume
2019
Issue
5
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889689690
Cited by
203
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18
FWCI
13.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Princeton University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
near-extremal black holes, quantum gravity, AdS2, constant electric field, Wheeler-DeWitt equation, wave function of the universe, quantum backreaction, correlation functions, complexity growth, event horizon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review